Skip to content

Conversation

@ibraheem-abe
Copy link
Contributor

8.5.2 /2025-01-17

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v8.5.1...v8.5.2

ibraheem-abe and others added 30 commits December 13, 2024 16:42
* use the tx pool for setting/committing weights

* add supports rpc method with cache

* handle when state call is not possible (unlikely)

* increment next index by one for correct nonce

* use for set sync set weights also

* oops, define in subtensor for sync methods

* make tests less specific

* try e2e test for commit weights

* modify comments on test

* add root set test helper

* try upping submit timeout

* add set weights e2e test

* use high timeout on tests

* add awaits and log netuid

* chore: ruff

* use sudo_set_admin_utils instead

* don't increment next index for nonce

* dont await sudo_set_admin_utils

* lower test ext timeout to 12

* enable reg during test

* use set hyp values instead

* sleep after setting reg allowed

* fix test_set_weights_uses_next_nonce

* Use asyncstdlib for lru_cache of `AsyncSubstrateInterface.supports_rpc_method`

* Increases sleep for txs in test_set_weights_uses_next_nonce

---------

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Himes <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ibraheem-opentensor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Himes <[email protected]>
…-connection-limit

[SDK] Handle server connection limit
…tatus-error-handler

[SDK] Improve InvalidStatus handler
…reveal

[SDK] Add async version of commit reveal v3
add_stake sdk (after pybytes error is fixed in delegate_info.py) another error occurs, because _do_stake is incorrectly called on line 124 in staking.py returning an invalid arguments error, must add self (subtensor) param to fix this error.
fix _do_stake incorrect arguments error in staking.py
@ibraheem-abe ibraheem-abe requested a review from a team January 17, 2025 03:20
@ibraheem-abe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@camfairchild camfairchild merged commit 313521d into master Jan 17, 2025
35 checks passed
This was referenced Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants