Skip to content

Conversation

chideraao
Copy link

Updates to the Validator scoring logic and Readme

@chideraao
Copy link
Author

cc: @ibraheem-abe

README.md Outdated
Comment on lines 64 to 65
git clone https://github.com/opentensor/subnet-template.git
cd subnet-template

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is what we want to do for a template.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you let me know what the idea is?

asking cause the readme walks through running the miner/validator logic defined in the repo but using the previous clone/change directory commands doesnt work.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well this is a template. So it's designed to be forked and the information in it updated by the forker. Having this hard-coded will work, and that's the problem. Because it works, people will think that's correct to do rather than updating the info to the fork.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gotcha! i can edit the README so that it includes the forking of the repo and then change the command to reflect that.

does that work?

validator.py Outdated
for response in responses
if response is not None
]
bt.logging.info(f"Successful responses: {successful_responses}")
Copy link

@ibraheem-abe ibraheem-abe Aug 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice if we can also mention the index which corresponds to the uid of the responses.
For example, if the raw responses were: None, None, 3, None, 6
Instead of outputting simply 3, and 6, it will be nice to know the uids associated with them.

Helps easily identify which miner is responding

Copy link
Author

@chideraao chideraao Aug 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tried something. wdyt

Screenshot 2025-08-13 at 22 37 43

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants