Skip to content

Update liquidity type in Tick and CurrentLiquidity#2128

Closed
gztensor wants to merge 16 commits intodevnet-readyfrom
fix/liquidity-gross-128
Closed

Update liquidity type in Tick and CurrentLiquidity#2128
gztensor wants to merge 16 commits intodevnet-readyfrom
fix/liquidity-gross-128

Conversation

@gztensor
Copy link
Contributor

@gztensor gztensor commented Oct 14, 2025

Description

  • Update u64 to u128 for liquidity storage
  • Migration to fix overflowing liquidity ticks and reserves
  • Migration to fix incorrect protocol liquidity (no reserve change, no price change)

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please describe):

Breaking Change

  • Ticks map is replaced with Ticks128, which returns a different Tick type (Tick128):
pub struct Tick128 {
    pub liquidity_net: i128,
    pub liquidity_gross: u128,
    pub fees_out_tao: I64F64,
    pub fees_out_alpha: I64F64,
}
  • CurrentLiquidity map is replaced with CurrentLiquidity128, which returns u128 instead of u64

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have run cargo fmt and cargo clippy to ensure my code is formatted and linted correctly
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@gztensor gztensor marked this pull request as draft November 4, 2025 15:52
@gztensor gztensor marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2025 20:36
@gztensor gztensor added the skip-cargo-audit This PR fails cargo audit but needs to be merged anyway label Nov 14, 2025
@gztensor gztensor closed this Jan 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip-cargo-audit This PR fails cargo audit but needs to be merged anyway

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant