Conversation
@feckert br-lan is a default therefore eth0 is going to far less often work then br-lan but anyway I have removed it. Also fixed quoting. |
|
You have a merge commit there. That should be removed. Likely via squashing with git rebase. |
6477630 to
52f6593
Compare
perceival
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have a merge commit there. That should be removed. Likely via squashing with git rebase.
(refreshing with a merge from master is not the right way. "git rebase master" would be more optimal)
Cheers Hannu!
Should be better now.
Regards,
percy
|
Sorry, that still isn't right. You still have three commits in the PR, but there should only be one commit. |
6af931d to
538704b
Compare
|
@feckert Indeed. Fixed now. |
|
Can you please also update the body of the commit. |
538704b to
5efa9cc
Compare
|
@feckert should be better already. |
|
So I’ve taken the time to have a look at what you’re actually doing there.
I would retrieve the necessary information from /etc/os-release witch is a symlink to ../usr/lib/os-release. This information in this file are populated during the build process and is not normally modified. The information in |
5efa9cc to
cac99c9
Compare
|
@feckert Updated as requested: commit body cleaned up, Signed-off-by added with full name/email, and distro source switched from /etc/banner to /etc/os-release. |
|
I do not see any changes? |
Read PRETTY_NAME from /etc/os-release via /bin/sh for distro output. Bump PKG_RELEASE to account for the package configuration change. Signed-off-by: Kamil Bienkiewicz <perceivalpercy@gmail.com>
cac99c9 to
85ef734
Compare
|
@feckert My fault. Didn't check if push was succesful. Now should be visible. |
📦 Package Details
Maintainer: @
(You can find this by checking the history of the package
Makefile.)Description:
🧪 Run Testing Details
✅ Formalities
If your PR contains a patch:
git am(e.g., subject line, commit description, etc.)
We must try to upstream patches to reduce maintenance burden.