Skip to content

Net snmp distro extend#28775

Open
perceival wants to merge 1 commit intoopenwrt:masterfrom
perceival:net-snmp-distro-extend
Open

Net snmp distro extend#28775
perceival wants to merge 1 commit intoopenwrt:masterfrom
perceival:net-snmp-distro-extend

Conversation

@perceival
Copy link

@perceival perceival commented Mar 13, 2026

📦 Package Details

Maintainer: @
(You can find this by checking the history of the package Makefile.)

Description:


🧪 Run Testing Details

  • OpenWrt Version:
  • OpenWrt Target/Subtarget:
  • OpenWrt Device:

✅ Formalities

  • I have reviewed the CONTRIBUTING.md file for detailed contributing guidelines.

If your PR contains a patch:

  • It can be applied using git am
  • It has been refreshed to avoid offsets, fuzzes, etc., using
    make package/<your-package>/refresh V=s
  • It is structured in a way that it is potentially upstreamable
    (e.g., subject line, commit description, etc.)
    We must try to upstream patches to reduce maintenance burden.

@feckert
Copy link
Member

feckert commented Mar 13, 2026

Can you please remove this commit 623334e from this PR See my comments in #28774
And the same applies here. This is a configuration setting.
The user can do whatever they like.

@perceival
Copy link
Author

Can you please remove this commit 623334e from this PR See my comments in #28774 And the same applies here. This is a configuration setting. The user can do whatever they like.

@feckert br-lan is a default therefore eth0 is going to far less often work then br-lan but anyway I have removed it. Also fixed quoting.

@perceival perceival requested a review from feckert March 14, 2026 11:01
@hnyman
Copy link
Contributor

hnyman commented Mar 15, 2026

You have a merge commit there. That should be removed. Likely via squashing with git rebase.
(refreshing with a merge from master is not the right way. "git rebase master" would be more optimal)

@perceival perceival force-pushed the net-snmp-distro-extend branch from 6477630 to 52f6593 Compare March 16, 2026 16:12
martahb

This comment was marked as duplicate.

Copy link
Author

@perceival perceival left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You have a merge commit there. That should be removed. Likely via squashing with git rebase.
(refreshing with a merge from master is not the right way. "git rebase master" would be more optimal)

Cheers Hannu!

Should be better now.

Regards,
percy

@perceival
Copy link
Author

@feckert @hnyman could you please review?

@feckert
Copy link
Member

feckert commented Mar 19, 2026

Sorry, that still isn't right. You still have three commits in the PR, but there should only be one commit.

@perceival perceival force-pushed the net-snmp-distro-extend branch 2 times, most recently from 6af931d to 538704b Compare March 19, 2026 09:34
@perceival
Copy link
Author

@feckert Indeed. Fixed now.

@feckert
Copy link
Member

feckert commented Mar 19, 2026

Can you please also update the body of the commit.
That doesn't look right

@perceival perceival force-pushed the net-snmp-distro-extend branch from 538704b to 5efa9cc Compare March 20, 2026 00:08
@perceival
Copy link
Author

@feckert should be better already.

@feckert
Copy link
Member

feckert commented Mar 20, 2026

So I’ve taken the time to have a look at what you’re actually doing there.
The formalities are still not in correct.

  • A “Signed-off-by” line with your full name and email address is missing.
  • The commit message should not be longer than 75 characters.

I would retrieve the necessary information from /etc/os-release witch is a symlink to ../usr/lib/os-release. This information in this file are populated during the build process and is not normally modified. The information in /etc/banner are not persistent and may change.

@perceival perceival force-pushed the net-snmp-distro-extend branch from 5efa9cc to cac99c9 Compare March 20, 2026 11:28
@perceival
Copy link
Author

@feckert Updated as requested: commit body cleaned up, Signed-off-by added with full name/email, and distro source switched from /etc/banner to /etc/os-release.

@feckert
Copy link
Member

feckert commented Mar 20, 2026

I do not see any changes?

Read PRETTY_NAME from /etc/os-release via /bin/sh for distro output.

Bump PKG_RELEASE to account for the package configuration change.

Signed-off-by: Kamil Bienkiewicz <perceivalpercy@gmail.com>
@perceival perceival force-pushed the net-snmp-distro-extend branch from cac99c9 to 85ef734 Compare March 20, 2026 14:49
@perceival
Copy link
Author

@feckert My fault. Didn't check if push was succesful. Now should be visible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants