Skip to content

Conversation

azych
Copy link
Contributor

@azych azych commented Mar 5, 2025

  • bumps operator-controller to non-rc monorepo version (1.2.0)
  • removes operator-framework/catalogd dependency as it's no longer needed
  • refactors references to operator-framework/catalogd API types to point to operator-controller

context: #218 (comment)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from exdx and jmrodri March 5, 2025 09:27
@azych azych force-pushed the bump-operator-controller-1.2.0 branch from 831873a to 1cc1f99 Compare March 5, 2025 10:45
@LalatenduMohanty
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me. Once we fix #224 (comment) we should be able to merge it.

@azych azych force-pushed the bump-operator-controller-1.2.0 branch from 1cc1f99 to 3ad6377 Compare March 7, 2025 10:00
@azych azych force-pushed the bump-operator-controller-1.2.0 branch from 3ad6377 to e84aff3 Compare March 7, 2025 10:03
go 1.23.0

toolchain go1.23.4
go 1.23.4

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since it is as we do in oper-controller: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-controller/blob/main/go.mod#L3

I am fine with the change 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

@azych azych Mar 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, bump in go version comes (at least) from operator-controller 1.2.0 requirement

and since we use the same version in go and toolchain, go mod tidy removes the toolchain line as redundant because it means the same thing implicitly, see docs link here: #224 (comment)

Copy link

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2025
@ankitathomas ankitathomas added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 6be5255 Mar 7, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants