Skip to content

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

@perdasilva perdasilva commented Sep 4, 2025

Description

Due to the kube-rbac-proxy deprecation the webhook-operator used for testing is breaking tests (downstream).
To mitigate this until we have a proper test-operator, I've recreated the project on my account (github.com/operator-framework/webhook-operator) and bumped it to the latest version of kubebuilder.

NOTE: this is just a mitigation. We really need an in-tree test-operator with webhook support to help drive these tests.

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@perdasilva perdasilva requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2025 11:33
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 4, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 77b4d9c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/68b9b3bdbaf8a90008b2e411
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2184--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title [WIP] Webhook operator update 🌱 [WIP] Webhook operator update Sep 4, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 4, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the webhook-operator-update branch from 8a2559f to 335463f Compare September 4, 2025 12:31
@perdasilva perdasilva marked this pull request as draft September 4, 2025 12:31
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 4, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the webhook-operator-update branch 2 times, most recently from 5dd744a to ea84f60 Compare September 4, 2025 15:06
@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title 🌱 [WIP] Webhook operator update 🌱 webhook operator update Sep 4, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.76%. Comparing base (5d6e431) to head (77b4d9c).
⚠️ Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2184      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.73%   72.76%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          79       79              
  Lines        7391     7391              
==========================================
+ Hits         5376     5378       +2     
+ Misses       1667     1666       -1     
+ Partials      348      347       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 44.22% <ø> (ø)
experimental-e2e 56.32% <ø> (+0.14%) ⬆️
unit 58.26% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title 🌱 webhook operator update 🌱 OCPBUGS-61213: webhook operator update Sep 4, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title 🌱 OCPBUGS-61213: webhook operator update 🐛 : OCPBUGS-61213: webhook operator update Sep 4, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2025 15:30
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 4, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from OchiengEd September 4, 2025 15:30
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the webhook-operator-update branch 2 times, most recently from 8af05db to 05e5d1c Compare September 4, 2025 15:32
@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title 🐛 : OCPBUGS-61213: webhook operator update 🐛 OCPBUGS-61213: webhook operator update Sep 4, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the webhook-operator-update branch from 05e5d1c to 40b721f Compare September 4, 2025 15:41
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the webhook-operator-update branch from 40b721f to 77b4d9c Compare September 4, 2025 15:43
- --webhook-cert-path=/tmp/k8s-webhook-server/serving-certs
command:
- /manager
image: quay.io/olmtest/webhook-operator:0.0.4
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the real important bit

Copy link
Contributor

@anik120 anik120 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 5, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 8, 2025

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 8, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 68610d0 into operator-framework:main Sep 8, 2025
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants