🌱 Add CLAUDE.MD

[perdasilva]

Description

This PR adds a CLAUDE.md file to assist maintainers / developers using claude code in their workflow.

This file was generated by claude code.

Reviewer Checklist

• API Go Documentation
• Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
• Comprehensive Commit Messages
• Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign tmshort for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	731e511
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/68f1f50136b9c90008e1ac50
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2275--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[pedjak]

@joelanford has opened a similar PR: #2274 which one should go in?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.93%. Comparing base (9eac616) to head (731e511).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2275   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.93%   72.93%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines        8743     8743           
=======================================
  Hits         6377     6377           
- Misses       1951     1952    +1     
+ Partials      415      414    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	39.38% <ø> (ø)
experimental-e2e	46.72% <ø> (ø)
unit	58.11% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[camilamacedo86]

That is great.
But before we add it, what info here is valid only for upstream?

If we add this, will all be valid for downstream? I do not think so,
So, how will we have information for upstream and another for downstream?

/hold until we have this answer.

@joelanford @tmshort have you ideas?
What about we ignore those files in the sync/bumper?
Than it would get solved. But do we want to have the same for downstream specifics?

[perdasilva]

@camilamacedo86 I've closed this in favor of the AGENTS.md file - I think that could be good for all agents