Skip to content

Conversation

camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Docs updated or added to /docs
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.17%. Comparing base (16c6783) to head (f66e280).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1658      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.15%   55.17%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         136      136              
  Lines       15911    15918       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         8776     8783       +7     
  Misses       5982     5982              
  Partials     1153     1153              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

/hold
This needs to be well-communicated and transparent about the process, so that no one is surprised and has ample opportunity for response.
The process is: https://github.com/operator-framework/community/blob/master/contributor-ladder.md#involuntary-removal-or-demotion

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 28, 2025
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title 🌱 Onwer Alias: Cleanup to remove those who are no longer with the project 🌱 Onwer Alias: Move to emeritus those who are no longer with the project Apr 28, 2025
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title 🌱 Onwer Alias: Move to emeritus those who are no longer with the project 🌱 Onwer Alias: Move inactive contributors to emeritus status to improve review process Apr 28, 2025
@tmshort tmshort changed the title 🌱 Onwer Alias: Move inactive contributors to emeritus status to improve review process 🌱 Owner Alias: Move inactive contributors to emeritus status to improve review process Apr 28, 2025
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title 🌱 Owner Alias: Move inactive contributors to emeritus status to improve review process 🌱 (cleanup): Update Owner Alias - remove inactive maintainers May 13, 2025
Removed maintainers from the Owner Alias who are no longer active in the project, in accordance with the [Contributor Ladder guidelines on inactive members](https://github.com/operator-framework/community/blob/master/contributor-ladder.md#inactive-members). They are invited to self-select emeritus status as outlined in the community process.
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel
Discussed in the last two community meetings, and we could reach a consensus.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 13, 2025
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi all! As part of this cleanup, we’ve updated OWNER_ALIASES to reflect current maintainers.

If you were removed due to inactivity, you're warmly invited to become an emeritus maintainer 💖

If you’d like to be listed, just open a PR adding your GitHub handle to the emeritus-approvers or emeritus-reviewers section like this:

emeritus-approvers:
  - awgreene
  - dinhxuanvu

emeritus-reviewers:
  - awgreene
  - benluddy
  - dinhxuanvu
  - jmrodri
  - theishshah
  - varshaprasad96
  - njhale

More info here: Contributor Ladder – Inactive Members

Thanks so much for all your past contributions — they’re truly appreciated! 🌟

cc @awgreene @dinhxuanvu @benluddy @jmrodri @theishshah @varshaprasad96 @njhale

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 requested a review from tmshort May 13, 2025 13:40
Copy link
Member

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 13, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, dinhxuanvu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 13, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4485156 into operator-framework:master May 13, 2025
12 checks passed
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 deleted the cleanup-owner-alias branch May 13, 2025 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants