Skip to content

Conversation

rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Docs updated or added to /docs
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from joelanford and tmshort May 17, 2025 02:27
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.17%. Comparing base (33a3372) to head (1fb5d94).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1675   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.17%   55.17%           
=======================================
  Files         136      136           
  Lines       15918    15918           
=======================================
  Hits         8783     8783           
  Misses       5982     5982           
  Partials     1153     1153           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joelanford, rashmigottipati

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 18, 2025
@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue May 18, 2025
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:master with commit 919aefd May 18, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati deleted the add-NP branch May 19, 2025 16:51
anik120 added a commit to anik120/operator-framework-operator-controller that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
This is a hack to backport "NetworkPolicy object kind in bundles" support from
operator-framework/operator-registry#1675
The feature was introduced in OCP 4.20 with a operator-registry bump to v1.55.0.
Ref:
1. operator-registry v1.55.0 release: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2. operator-registry bump in OCP 4.20: operator-framework/operator-controller#1981
Because the upstream PR is not being backported in operator-registry to older tags (with new z stream releases),
this achieves a downstream-only backport for this feature.
anik120 added a commit to anik120/operator-framework-operator-controller that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
This is a hack to backport "NetworkPolicy object kind in bundles" support from
operator-framework/operator-registry#1675
The feature was introduced in OCP 4.20 with a operator-registry bump to v1.55.0.
Ref:
1. operator-registry v1.55.0 release: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2. operator-registry bump in OCP 4.20: operator-framework/operator-controller#1981
Because the upstream PR is not being backported in operator-registry to older tags (with new z stream releases),
this achieves a downstream-only backport for this feature.
anik120 added a commit to anik120/operator-framework-operator-controller that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
This is a hack to backport "NetworkPolicy object kind in bundles" support from
operator-framework/operator-registry#1675
The feature was introduced in OCP 4.20 with a operator-registry bump to v1.55.0.
Ref:
1. operator-registry v1.55.0 release: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2. operator-registry bump in OCP 4.20: operator-framework/operator-controller#1981
Because the upstream PR is not being backported in operator-registry to older tags (with new z stream releases),
this achieves a downstream-only backport for this feature.
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit to openshift/operator-framework-operator-controller that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
This is a hack to backport "NetworkPolicy object kind in bundles" support from
operator-framework/operator-registry#1675
The feature was introduced in OCP 4.20 with a operator-registry bump to v1.55.0.
Ref:
1. operator-registry v1.55.0 release: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2. operator-registry bump in OCP 4.20: operator-framework/operator-controller#1981
Because the upstream PR is not being backported in operator-registry to older tags (with new z stream releases),
this achieves a downstream-only backport for this feature.
openshift-cherrypick-robot pushed a commit to openshift-cherrypick-robot/operator-framework-operator-controller that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
This is a hack to backport "NetworkPolicy object kind in bundles" support from
operator-framework/operator-registry#1675
The feature was introduced in OCP 4.20 with a operator-registry bump to v1.55.0.
Ref:
1. operator-registry v1.55.0 release: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2. operator-registry bump in OCP 4.20: operator-framework/operator-controller#1981
Because the upstream PR is not being backported in operator-registry to older tags (with new z stream releases),
this achieves a downstream-only backport for this feature.
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit to openshift/operator-framework-operator-controller that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2025
This is a hack to backport "NetworkPolicy object kind in bundles" support from
operator-framework/operator-registry#1675
The feature was introduced in OCP 4.20 with a operator-registry bump to v1.55.0.
Ref:
1. operator-registry v1.55.0 release: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2. operator-registry bump in OCP 4.20: operator-framework/operator-controller#1981
Because the upstream PR is not being backported in operator-registry to older tags (with new z stream releases),
this achieves a downstream-only backport for this feature.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants