Skip to content

Conversation

@ogenstad
Copy link
Contributor

@ogenstad ogenstad commented Aug 15, 2025

This is mostly to get rid of annoying warnings in my editor..

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Standardized capitalization to “Infrahub” across SDK docstrings and inline comments.
    • Clarified wording in a validation comment for repository configuration.
    • Updated wording in testing utilities docstrings for consistency.
  • Tests

    • Adjusted comment capitalization in integration tests to match terminology standards.
  • Style

    • Minor text-only edits; no behavioral or interface changes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Walkthrough

Capitalization updates in comments and docstrings from “infrahub” to “Infrahub” across SDK, testing utilities, and an integration test. No functional, behavioral, or interface changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Comments in pytest plugin
infrahub_sdk/pytest_plugin/items/graphql_query.py
Comment wording updated to “Infrahub repository configuration”. No code changes.
Docstring in schema
infrahub_sdk/schema/repository.py
Class docstring capitalization updated (“Infrahub”). No behavior changes.
Docstring in testing utility
infrahub_sdk/testing/docker.py
Docstring capitalization updated in skip_version. No logic changes.
Comments in integration test
tests/integration/test_infrahub_client.py
Capitalization fixes in comments within test_get_all. No test logic changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch pog-infrahub-case

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or Summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

Deploying infrahub-sdk-python with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 8273796
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://f233e2e5.infrahub-sdk-python.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://pog-infrahub-case.infrahub-sdk-python.pages.dev

View logs

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #498      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    76.25%   75.74%   -0.52%     
===========================================
  Files          100      100              
  Lines         9036     8846     -190     
  Branches      1732     1732              
===========================================
- Hits          6890     6700     -190     
  Misses        1670     1670              
  Partials       476      476              
Flag Coverage Δ
integration-tests 34.67% <ø> (-1.38%) ⬇️
python-3.10 48.19% <ø> (-1.12%) ⬇️
python-3.11 48.19% <ø> (-1.09%) ⬇️
python-3.12 48.19% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
python-3.13 48.19% <ø> (-1.09%) ⬇️
python-3.9 46.88% <ø> (-1.12%) ⬇️
python-filler-3.12 25.09% <ø> (+0.52%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
infrahub_sdk/pytest_plugin/items/graphql_query.py 48.48% <ø> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/schema/repository.py 87.24% <ø> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/testing/docker.py 58.33% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
infrahub_sdk/testing/docker.py (1)

16-17: Docstring capitalization fix looks good; consider aligning nearby comments too

"Infrahub" is now correctly capitalized in the docstring. To keep consistency with the PR’s objective, consider updating the lowercase "infrahub" occurrences in the nearby comments within the InvalidVersion except block (Lines 25–27).

infrahub_sdk/schema/repository.py (1)

27-27: Tiny grammar tweak in docstring

Consider pluralizing “purpose” to “purposes” for natural phrasing.

-    """Class to regroup all elements of the Infrahub configuration for a repository for typing purpose."""
+    """Class to regroup all elements of the Infrahub configuration for a repository for typing purposes."""
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3269a41 and 8273796.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • infrahub_sdk/pytest_plugin/items/graphql_query.py (1 hunks)
  • infrahub_sdk/schema/repository.py (1 hunks)
  • infrahub_sdk/testing/docker.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/test_infrahub_client.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.9)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: integration-tests-latest-infrahub
🔇 Additional comments (2)
infrahub_sdk/pytest_plugin/items/graphql_query.py (1)

19-20: Comment capitalization is consistent with branding

Comment reads well and aligns with the PR goal. No further changes needed.

tests/integration/test_infrahub_client.py (1)

68-71: Consistent capitalization in test comments

Updated “Infrahub” capitalization matches the branding and keeps comments consistent. LGTM.

@ogenstad ogenstad requested a review from a team August 15, 2025 12:54
@ogenstad ogenstad merged commit 8f1ab44 into develop Aug 15, 2025
20 checks passed
@ogenstad ogenstad deleted the pog-infrahub-case branch August 15, 2025 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants