Bring AlmaLinux-9 and AlmaLinux-8 to distros back #2029
Conversation
|
Huh. That's surprising and not fun. They must've been not migrated to the YAML when we moved over to it. Is it OK if I push a test to your PR that ensures the distros are available so this can't happen again? |
Sure, that would be great |
supakeen
left a comment
supakeen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've tested that this works, let's get them back in so they're in the next release of image-builder.
I'll be adding an assertion to image-builder's testing shortly that ensures that alma linux image types do not disappear (since we already have testing there that does the same for other distros).
Assert the required-to-exist Alma Linux (and Kitten) image types for 8, 9, and 10. This will fail until the related `images` PR [1] lands and is in a released version of `images`. [1]: osbuild/images#2029 Signed-off-by: Simon de Vlieger <[email protected]>
|
Draft PR that can be merged after this makes it into |
Assert the required-to-exist Alma Linux (and Kitten) image types for 8, 9, and 10. This will fail until the related `images` PR [1] lands and is in a released version of `images`. [1]: osbuild/images#2029 Signed-off-by: Simon de Vlieger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: eabdullin <[email protected]>
Assert the required-to-exist Alma Linux (and Kitten) image types for 8, 9, and 10. This will fail until the related `images` PR [1] lands and is in a released version of `images`. [1]: osbuild/images#2029 Signed-off-by: Simon de Vlieger <[email protected]>
Assert the required-to-exist Alma Linux (and Kitten) image types for 8, 9, and 10. This will fail until the related `images` PR [1] lands and is in a released version of `images`. [1]: osbuild/images#2029 Signed-off-by: Simon de Vlieger <[email protected]>
3 participants
Recently, with the AlmaLinux 9.7 release, I found that osbuild no longer includes AlmaLinux 8 and 9.
This PR adds support for them.