generated from ossf/project-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
refactor: AC-04.01 control for clarity #396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non blocking nit:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like your suggestion but I think it does change the focus of the requirement from one in which the task's permissions are not configured/unspecified and therefore the task runs in the presumably more well defined and least privilege permission context of it's (the task's) enclosing pipeline to one in which the enclosing pipeline should more proactively try to understand the permission requirements of the task and assign only those.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are there CI/CD systems that use the highest permissions as a default? Or is the intent here to say "tasks should have read-only permissions unless explicitly granted more permissions at the task level"?
For example, if I have a github workflow that grants write at the top level of the workflow, would a job in that workflow that inherits write permission violate this control? Does the answer to that question depend on whether or not the job needs write permission?
If the answer is yes (or at least a conditional yes), maybe we're better off being more direct and saying "CI/CD tasks that require permissions beyond read must have permissions explicitly granted at every step" (except with better wording)