Skip to content

Remove mention of archived repo #929

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 25, 2025
Merged

Remove mention of archived repo #929

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 25, 2025

Conversation

@andrewpollock
Copy link
Contributor

This removes the mention of and outlink to the package-manager-best-practices repo, given the repo is archived.

@andrewpollock
Remove mention of archived repo
def258d 
This removes the mention of and outlink to the package-manager-best-practices repo, given the repo is archived.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Pollock <[email protected]>
@gkunz
Copy link
Contributor

gkunz commented Jun 20, 2025

Hi @andrewpollock. Just curious: Is this content being superseeded by work done in the security repos WG? If so, I am just wondering if it would be useful to point to from the archived repo to that work.

@andrewpollock
Merge branch 'main' into patch-1
323411c 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pollock <[email protected]>
@andrewpollock
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gkunz I can't say, sorry, I'm just trying to correct a deficiency that I'm seeing. Do you know who can speak to the archiving of the https://github.com/ossf/package-manager-best-practices repo and what the intended replacements for the content there are?

ctcpip
ctcpip requested changes Jul 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@ctcpip ctcpip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should remove it just because it is archived. It needs some work and should probably live in this repo, but if we think it still has useful/helpful information, we shouldn't erase the link to it.

@thomasnyman thomasnyman added the readme Pull requests that update readme files label Sep 9, 2025
@gkunz
Copy link
Contributor

gkunz commented Sep 23, 2025

In order to move this forward, I have resolved the conflicts and changed the "state" of the affected effort from "incubating" to "archived" to reflect the state of the repository. The link remains listed in the table.

@ctcpip

@gkunz gkunz requested a review from balteravishay September 23, 2025 14:30
balteravishay
balteravishay approved these changes Sep 23, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@balteravishay balteravishay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good, thanks!

@gkunz
Copy link
Contributor

gkunz commented Sep 25, 2025

@ctcpip could you please re-review? I have addressed your comment. Thank you.

@gkunz gkunz merged commit 911549c into ossf:main Sep 25, 2025
2 checks passed
sueszli pushed a commit to sueszli/wg-best-practices-os-developers that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
@andrewpollock @gkunz @sueszli
Remove mention of archived repo (ossf#929)
5ed72a8 
This updates the state of the package-manager-best-practices initiative from incubating to archived, given the repo is archived.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Pollock <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Georg Kunz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Georg Kunz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@balteravishay balteravishay balteravishay approved these changes

@ctcpip ctcpip ctcpip approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

readme Pull requests that update readme files

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@andrewpollock @gkunz @balteravishay @ctcpip @thomasnyman