Conversation
|
Quick links (staging server):
Login: chart-diff: ✅No charts for review.data-diff: ✅ No differences foundAutomatically updated datasets matching excess_mortality|covid|fluid|flunet|country_profile|garden/ihme_gbd/2019/gbd_risk are not included Edited: 2026-03-02 11:01:25 UTC |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 37a0ca693a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
rakyi
force-pushed
the
add-force-datapage
branch
from
37a0ca6 to
0edddc2
Compare
|
Changing the reviewer to @Marigold since it's more complicated than I thought and touches chart sync. |
Marigold
left a comment
Marigold
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks good, though I'd need an example at hand to verify it. Let's merge it and then double check when we get a real use case.
3 participants
Depends on owid/owid-grapher#6164