fix(formatter): ignore the leading line break for the first argument of the call expression

[Dunqing]

No description provided.

[Dunqing]

• fix(formatter): print a line break incorrectly for directives #14577
• refactor(formatter): simplify foramtting import and export #14576
• refactor(formatter): remove SiblingNode #14551
• refactor(formatter): improve printing comments for special nodes #14544
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments that are around the StaticMemberExpression #14543
• fix(formatter): no need to wrap a parenthesis for TSConditionalType and TSFunctionType when its parent is TSUnionType and it only has one element #14540
• refactor(formatter): improve line break detaching logic in SourceText #14539
• fix(formatter): missing parenthesis for ComputedMemberExpression when its parent is an NewExpression #14530
• fix(formatter): missing parenthesis for PrivateInExpression when its parent is an UnaryExpression #14529
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments for logical expression #14500
• fix(formatter): should break even if the right side of the assignment is a require when it has a leading own line comment #14499
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments for the end of union type #14498
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments for try statement #14497
• fix(formatter): should expand the parent if the member chain will break #14487
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments around the expression of ComputedMemberExpression #14486
• fix(formatter): correct printing yield argument #14485
• fix(formatter): no need to wrap with parentheses for a type cast node #14484
• fix(formatter): ignore the leading line break for the first argument of the call expression #14483 👈 (View in Graphite)
• fix(formatter): correct checking comments between the operator and the right side for assignment like nodes #14482
• fix(formatter): block comments without a leading linebreak that are around the operator of the conditional expression should be printed as-is #14474
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments for for statements #14473
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments for assignment pattern #14469
• test(formatter): add snapshot-based test infrastructure #14400
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #14483 will not alter performance

_{Comparing 10-10-fix_formatter_ignore_the_leading_line_break_for_the_first_argument_of_the_call_expression (b159215) with 10-10-fix_formatter_correct_checking_comments_between_the_operator_and_the_right_side_for_assignment_like_nodes (ea8f9ed)}

Summary

✅ 33 untouched
⏩ 4 skipped¹

Footnotes

1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[graphite-app]

Merge activity

• Oct 12, 4:12 PM UTC: Dunqing added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Oct 12, 4:30 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.