Skip to content

feat: [PIDM-199] Bump actions/cache version to 4.2 #77

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
pasqualespica merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025
Merged

feat: [PIDM-199] Bump actions/cache version to 4.2 #77

pasqualespica merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

@svariant
Copy link
Contributor

@svariant svariant commented Feb 28, 2025 •
edited by atlassian bot
Loading

List of Changes

  • Bump actions/cache version to 4.2

Motivation and Context

PIDM-199

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@svariant svariant added the skip label Feb 28, 2025
@svariant svariant requested a review from a team as a code owner February 28, 2025 07:50
@pasqualespica pasqualespica merged commit 525266f into main Mar 5, 2025
5 checks passed
@pasqualespica pasqualespica deleted the PIDM-199-bump-action-cache branch March 5, 2025 17:51
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.2.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pasqualespica pasqualespica pasqualespica approved these changes

Assignees

@svariant svariant

Labels

released skip

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@svariant @pasqualespica