Skip to content

Conversation

jseabold
Copy link
Contributor

This should close #2844. Good but unsettling news is it wasn't an implementation bug. The logic for handling months in the YearBegin offset just wasn't written. It was hard-coded to always be Year, 1, 1.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this an indentation error or is all the code below unreachable?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's intentionally unreachable, though unintentionally left in. Removed in most recent commit.

@jseabold
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI, rebased.

@wesm
Copy link
Member

wesm commented Mar 28, 2013

This breaks some unit tests. Can you take a look?

@jseabold
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, I don't think the expectations for AS were correct in those tests.

@wesm wesm merged commit f9e533a into pandas-dev:master Apr 8, 2013
@wesm
Copy link
Member

wesm commented Apr 8, 2013

Thanks Skipper!

@jseabold jseabold deleted the fix-2844 branch April 9, 2013 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Problem with YearBegin frequency?

2 participants