DOCS: remove outdated PeriodDtype.from_date_offset comment, use DateOffset instead of BaseOffset in docstrings
#61096
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
🤦 i pushed to a branch in pandas-dev instead of in my fork, i'll start this one over |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)
Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
All code checks passed.
Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
Added an entry in the latest
doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rstfile if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.closes DOC: should
DateOffsetalways be used instead ofBaseOffset? #60886PeriodDtype.from_date_offsetwas removed in REF: de-duplicate hard-coded unit code #46338some drive-by walruses