Skip to content

ENH: Added features of issue 61691 #61738

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

ishaan1234
Copy link

@ishaan1234 ishaan1234 commented Jun 29, 2025

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

@ishaan1234 generally its best to wait to implement a requested feature until there is a consensus in the issue that it is something we want to do. Requests for new top-level APIs usually get politely rejected.

@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @ishaan1234 but as mentioned, this feature needs discussion before a pull request will be considered so closing this PR for now

@mroeschke mroeschke closed this Jun 30, 2025
@ishaan1234
Copy link
Author

@ishaan1234 generally its best to wait to implement a requested feature until there is a consensus in the issue that it is something we want to do. Requests for new top-level APIs usually get politely rejected.

Alright! Thanks!

@ishaan1234
Copy link
Author

Thanks @ishaan1234 but as mentioned, this feature needs discussion before a pull request will be considered so closing this PR for now

Okay

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Proposal: Add pd.check(df) utility function for quick dataset diagnostics
3 participants