DOC : document pyarrow vs python string trade-offs #63505
+44
−7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
afeld
approved these changes
Dec 30, 2025
Contributor
afeld
left a comment
afeld
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't have deep expertise in the storage backends, but as a reader, this makes sense to me. Thanks for the contribution!
Author
|
Thank you for the review and kind feedback ! I'm glad the documentation is clear and helpful. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds documentation describing the differences and trade-offs
between pyarrow-backed and python object string storage.
Addresses #63105