Skip to content

Conversation

yikelu
Copy link

@yikelu yikelu commented Aug 5, 2014

Not too much to say; this is a documentation PR.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought it was dependent on the version of HDF5 not PyTables.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's right, its techincally the HDF5 version (though PyTables does have some differences, e.g. < 3.1 does allow concurrent reads, while 3.1 is pretty strict).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yikelu actually if you don't mind, can you break this out into a separate section (maybe before Caveats), related to issue: #7838 (e.g. take some of the info from their too)...then can close that issue

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jan 18, 2015

@yikelu can you update according to above comments?

@yikelu
Copy link
Author

yikelu commented Jan 19, 2015

@jreback I've been incredibly busy, and I haven't figured out the
documentation.

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:31 PM, jreback [email protected] wrote:

@yikelu https://github.com/yikelu can you update according to above
comments?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#7944 (comment).

@jreback jreback added this to the 0.17.0 milestone Jan 19, 2015
@jreback jreback modified the milestones: 0.17.0, Next Major Release May 9, 2015
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 9, 2015

@yikelu can you update, pls.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jul 28, 2015

closing as stale, but if you would like to reopen and fixup pls do.

@jreback jreback closed this Jul 28, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Docs IO HDF5 read_hdf, HDFStore

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants