Skip to content

Fix CI/CD pipeline failures: formatting violations and missing frontend Dockerfile#3

Merged
pangerlkr merged 3 commits intomainfrom
copilot/fix-actions-workflow-errors
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

Fix CI/CD pipeline failures: formatting violations and missing frontend Dockerfile#3
pangerlkr merged 3 commits intomainfrom
copilot/fix-actions-workflow-errors

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 2, 2026

Two jobs in the CI/CD pipeline were failing: Lint and Code Quality due to formatting violations, and Docker Build Test due to a missing frontend Dockerfile.

Changes

Python formatting and import sorting

  • Applied Black formatter to 7 Python files (modules-python, gateway, tests)
  • Applied isort to fix import ordering across same files

Frontend Docker configuration

  • Created frontend/Dockerfile for Node.js 18 Alpine
  • Copies package*.json for reproducible builds via lockfile

The docker-compose.yml already referenced frontend/Dockerfile but the file didn't exist, causing the build to fail with open Dockerfile: no such file or directory.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI and others added 2 commits February 2, 2026 02:58
Co-authored-by: pangerlkr <73515951+pangerlkr@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pangerlkr <73515951+pangerlkr@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix errors in Actions workflows Fix CI/CD pipeline failures: formatting violations and missing frontend Dockerfile Feb 2, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from pangerlkr February 2, 2026 03:00
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@pangerlkr pangerlkr marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2026 04:02
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@pangerlkr pangerlkr merged commit f28d5bc into main Feb 2, 2026
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants