Skip to content

Conversation

codewithnuh
Copy link

Summary

This update adds a dedicated section under the "Types generation script" heading to explain an issue commonly encountered by users working with Payload in a default Next.js setup.

Problem

When running:

payload generate:types

users may face an error due to the absence of the "type": "module" field in their package.json file. This happens because the type generation script relies on ECMAScript Module (ESM) resolution, which is not enabled by default in most Next.js configurations.

Solution

The documentation now explicitly instructs users to add "type": "module" to their package.json file. This:

  • Prevents confusion and build errors
  • Reduces developer frustration and support requests
  • Aligns the documentation with modern TypeScript + Next.js workflows

Why it matters

This small clarification ensures that new users integrating Payload CMS into Next.js projects have a smoother experience when generating types, without hitting unnecessary roadblocks.


…t.js projects

This update adds a dedicated section under the "Types generation script" heading to explain 
an issue commonly encountered by users working with Payload in a default Next.js setup.

When running `payload generate:types`, users may face an error due to the absence of the 
"type": "module" field in their package.json file. This is because the type generation script 
relies on ECMAScript Module (ESM) resolution, which is not enabled by default in most 
Next.js configurations.

The new documentation helps users identify and resolve this issue by explicitly instructing 
them to add `"type": "module"` to their package.json. This change aims to prevent developer 
frustration and reduce support questions around broken type generation workflows.

Also ensures the documentation aligns better with the expectations of modern TypeScript + 
Next.js users integrating Payload CMS in their stacks.
@krixnaas
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Aug 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants