Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
some transaction tests currently failing. No time to investigate currently |
Collaborator
|
Hi Julian. Thank you for this PR. I am unfamiliar with MWEB and this is not something I believe can be added to coinlib right now, especially due to time constraints. I would suggest keeping a fork of coinlib with these additional features you desire, but I would also suggest not changing the formatting of the code as that would make merging upstream changes more difficult. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Minimal changes required to handle Litecoin MWEB transactions when using mwebd.
Includes QoL
toString()functions for some classes.A bunch of dart auto formatting included.