Skip to content

Comments

PSMDB-1890 Include libarchive in the SBOM#1668

Closed
ktrushin wants to merge 10 commits intov8.0from
psmdb-1890-80
Closed

PSMDB-1890 Include libarchive in the SBOM#1668
ktrushin wants to merge 10 commits intov8.0from
psmdb-1890-80

Conversation

@ktrushin
Copy link

No description provided.

@ktrushin ktrushin removed the request for review from igorsol January 28, 2026 11:17
Copy link

@igorsol igorsol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix those typos.
Great job!

Example:
We clone the upstream https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive into
https://github.com/Percona-Lab/libarchive, including all branches and tags,
giving PSMD developers the same access to the clone as they have to the PSMDB
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PSMDB developers (typo)

| [International Components for Unicode C/C++ (ICU4C)] | Unicode-3.0 | 57.1 | ✗ | ✗ |
| [JSON Schema Store] | Apache-2.0 | 6847cfc3a17a04a7664474212db50c627e1e3408 | | |
| [JSON-Schema-Test-Suite] | MIT | 728066f9c5c258ba3b1804a22a5b998f2ec77ec0 | | |
| [libarchive] | A mix of BSD-2-Clasue and others | 3.8.4 | ✗ | ✗ |
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it be "ClaUSe"?

sbom.json Outdated
"licenses": [
{
"license": {
"name": "A mix of BSD-2-Clasue and others",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clause?

@ktrushin ktrushin force-pushed the psmdb-1890-80 branch 3 times, most recently from 27d5b3a to ede4e12 Compare February 3, 2026 06:39
Regenerate `README.third_party.md` with the `gen_thirdpartyreadme.py`
script based on the new revision of `sbom.json` that includes
`libarchive`.
Note. The script also added `SCons` to the generated file because
its source code is still in the `src/third_party` directory.
Since `SCons` isn't really used anymore, its mention was removed
manually from `README.third_party.md`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants