Fix superclass initializer false-positive when called on subclass #1010
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a subclass inherits an initializer from its superclass, calling the initializer on the subclass (e.g.,
Child(param: "foo")) was not marking the superclass initializer as used, causing a false-positive.The index store records a relationship from the superclass initializer to the subclass implicit initializer, but not the inverse. Added a new mutator (InheritedImplicitInitializerReferenceBuilder) that creates the inverse reference so that when the implicit initializer is used, the superclass initializer is also marked as used.
Fixes #957