Add Podman integration tests for OCI runtime compatibility by Copilot · Pull Request #1143 · philips-software/amp-devcontainer

Copilot · 2026-02-06T16:20:18Z

Proves OCI runtime compatibility by running integration tests on both Docker (GitHub Actions container: key) and Podman.

Changes

New workflow: wc-integration-test-podman.yml
- Installs Podman on Ubuntu runners
- Pulls image and executes BATS tests via podman run
- Uploads results with -podman- suffix for distinction
Updated: wc-build-push-test.yml
- Added integration-test-podman job running in parallel with existing integration-test
- Both jobs use identical test files and runner matrix

Implementation

Docker tests continue using GitHub's native container execution:

container:
  image: ${{ inputs.fully-qualified-image-name }}@${{ inputs.image-digest }}

Podman tests install runtime and execute explicitly:

- name: Run integration tests using Podman
  run: |
    podman run --rm \
      -v "${{ github.workspace }}:${{ github.workspace }}" \
      -w "${{ github.workspace }}" \
      -e IMAGE_BASENAME="${IMAGE_BASENAME}" \
      ${{ inputs.fully-qualified-image-name }}@${{ inputs.image-digest }} \
      bats --formatter junit "${TEST_FILE}"

Both test paths run on x64 and ARM64 runners. Test results publish automatically via existing workflow.

Original prompt

Prove compatibility with multiple OCI runtimes by running the integration tests on Podman next to the current GitHub native 'container:' way

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

github-actions · 2026-02-06T16:21:43Z

Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.

⚠️ Details

No release type found in pull request title "Add Podman integration tests for OCI runtime compatibility". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:

feat: A new feature
fix: A bug fix
docs: Documentation only changes
style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
perf: A code change that improves performance
test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
revert: Reverts a previous commit

Co-authored-by: rjaegers <45816308+rjaegers@users.noreply.github.com>

.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+      - name: Login to container registry
+        run: |
+          echo "${{ secrets.DOCKER_REGISTRY_PASSWORD || github.token }}" | \
+            podman login ${{ inputs.registry }} \


Co-authored-by: rjaegers <45816308+rjaegers@users.noreply.github.com>

github-actions · 2026-02-06T16:23:54Z

📦 Container Size Analysis

Note

Comparing ghcr.io/philips-software/amp-devcontainer-base:edge ➔ ghcr.io/philips-software/amp-devcontainer-base:pr-1143

📈 Size Comparison Table

OS/Platform	Previous	Current	Change	Trend
linux/amd64	174.05 MB	174.05 MB	976 B (0%)	🔽
linux/arm64	166.57 MB	166.57 MB	+18 B (+0%)	🔼

github-actions · 2026-02-06T16:24:12Z

✅⚠️MegaLinter analysis: Success with warnings

Descriptor	Linter	Files	Fixed	Errors	Warnings	Elapsed time
✅ ACTION	actionlint	22		0	0	0.55s
✅ DOCKERFILE	hadolint	3		0	0	0.64s
✅ GHERKIN	gherkin-lint	6		0	0	2.34s
✅ JSON	npm-package-json-lint	yes		no	no	0.39s
✅ JSON	prettier	21	4	0	0	0.64s
✅ JSON	v8r	21		0	0	19.78s
✅ MARKDOWN	markdownlint	12	0	0	0	0.92s
✅ MARKDOWN	markdown-table-formatter	12	0	0	0	0.24s
✅ REPOSITORY	checkov	yes		no	no	16.58s
✅ REPOSITORY	gitleaks	yes		no	no	0.54s
✅ REPOSITORY	git_diff	yes		no	no	0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY	grype	yes		no	no	29.12s
✅ REPOSITORY	secretlint	yes		no	no	0.95s
✅ REPOSITORY	syft	yes		no	no	1.91s
✅ REPOSITORY	trivy	yes		no	no	5.66s
✅ REPOSITORY	trivy-sbom	yes		no	no	0.25s
✅ REPOSITORY	trufflehog	yes		no	no	2.23s
⚠️ SPELL	lychee	82		1	0	21.73s
✅ YAML	prettier	30	0	0	0	0.89s
✅ YAML	v8r	30		0	0	7.67s
✅ YAML	yamllint	30		0	0	0.86s

Detailed Issues

⚠️ SPELL / lychee - 1 error

[IGNORED] docker://pandoc/extra:3.7.0@sha256:a703d335fa237f8fc3303329d87e2555dca5187930da38bfa9010fa4e690933a | Unsupported: Error creating request client: builder error for url (docker://pandoc/extra:3.7.0@sha256:a703d335fa237f8fc3303329d87e2555dca5187930da38bfa9010fa4e690933a)
[403] https://developer.arm.com/downloads/-/arm-gnu-toolchain-downloads | Network error: Forbidden
[IGNORED] https://vscode.dev/redirect?url=vscode://ms-vscode-remote.remote-containers/cloneInVolume?url=https://github.com/philips-software/amp-devcontainer | Unsupported: Error creating request client: builder error for url (vscode://ms-vscode-remote.remote-containers/cloneInVolume?url=https://github.com/philips-software/amp-devcontainer)
📝 Summary
---------------------
🔍 Total..........126
✅ Successful.....123
⏳ Timeouts.........0
🔀 Redirected.......0
👻 Excluded.........0
❓ Unknown..........0
🚫 Errors...........1

Errors in .github/TOOL_VERSION_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
[403] https://developer.arm.com/downloads/-/arm-gnu-toolchain-downloads | Network error: Forbidden

See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts

Your project could benefit from a custom flavor, which would allow you to run only the linters you need, and thus improve runtime performances. (Skip this info by defining FLAVOR_SUGGESTIONS: false)

Documentation: Custom Flavors
Command: npx mega-linter-runner@9.3.0 --custom-flavor-setup --custom-flavor-linters ACTION_ACTIONLINT,DOCKERFILE_HADOLINT,GHERKIN_GHERKIN_LINT,JSON_V8R,JSON_PRETTIER,JSON_NPM_PACKAGE_JSON_LINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWNLINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWN_TABLE_FORMATTER,REPOSITORY_CHECKOV,REPOSITORY_GIT_DIFF,REPOSITORY_GITLEAKS,REPOSITORY_GRYPE,REPOSITORY_SECRETLINT,REPOSITORY_SYFT,REPOSITORY_TRIVY,REPOSITORY_TRIVY_SBOM,REPOSITORY_TRUFFLEHOG,SPELL_LYCHEE,YAML_PRETTIER,YAML_YAMLLINT,YAML_V8R

Co-authored-by: rjaegers <45816308+rjaegers@users.noreply.github.com>

sonarqubecloud · 2026-02-06T16:25:37Z

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
E Security Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+            -e IMAGE_BASENAME="${IMAGE_BASENAME}" \
+            -e TEST_FILE="${TEST_FILE}" \
+            -e RUNNER_ARCH="${RUNNER_ARCH}" \
+            ${{ inputs.fully-qualified-image-name }}@${{ inputs.image-digest }} \


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+            -e IMAGE_BASENAME="${IMAGE_BASENAME}" \
+            -e TEST_FILE="${TEST_FILE}" \
+            -e RUNNER_ARCH="${RUNNER_ARCH}" \
+            ${{ inputs.fully-qualified-image-name }}@${{ inputs.image-digest }} \


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+      - name: Login to container registry
+        run: |
+          echo "${{ secrets.DOCKER_REGISTRY_PASSWORD || github.token }}" | \
+            podman login ${{ inputs.registry }} \


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+        run: |
+          echo "${{ secrets.DOCKER_REGISTRY_PASSWORD || github.token }}" | \
+            podman login ${{ inputs.registry }} \
+              --username "${{ secrets.DOCKER_REGISTRY_USERNAME || github.actor }}" \


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+              --password-stdin
+      - name: Pull container image
+        run: |
+          podman pull ${{ inputs.fully-qualified-image-name }}@${{ inputs.image-digest }}


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+              --password-stdin
+      - name: Pull container image
+        run: |
+          podman pull ${{ inputs.fully-qualified-image-name }}@${{ inputs.image-digest }}


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+              --password-stdin
+      - name: Pull container image
+        run: |
+          podman pull ${{ inputs.fully-qualified-image-name }}@${{ inputs.image-digest }}


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+        run: |
+          echo "${{ secrets.DOCKER_REGISTRY_PASSWORD || github.token }}" | \
+            podman login ${{ inputs.registry }} \
+              --username "${{ secrets.DOCKER_REGISTRY_USERNAME || github.actor }}" \


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+      - name: Login to container registry
+        run: |
+          echo "${{ secrets.DOCKER_REGISTRY_PASSWORD || github.token }}" | \
+            podman login ${{ inputs.registry }} \


.github/workflows/wc-integration-test-podman.yml

+          podman --version
+      - name: Login to container registry
+        run: |
+          echo "${{ secrets.DOCKER_REGISTRY_PASSWORD || github.token }}" | \


github-actions · 2026-02-06T16:35:30Z

📦 Container Size Analysis

Note

Comparing ghcr.io/philips-software/amp-devcontainer-rust:edge ➔ ghcr.io/philips-software/amp-devcontainer-rust:pr-1143

📈 Size Comparison Table

OS/Platform	Previous	Current	Change	Trend
linux/amd64	554.46 MB	554.46 MB	1.13 kB (0%)	🔽
linux/arm64	508.69 MB	508.69 MB	+37 B (+0%)	🔼

github-actions · 2026-02-06T16:36:54Z

📦 Container Size Analysis

Note

Comparing ghcr.io/philips-software/amp-devcontainer-cpp:edge ➔ ghcr.io/philips-software/amp-devcontainer-cpp:pr-1143

📈 Size Comparison Table

OS/Platform	Previous	Current	Change	Trend
linux/amd64	695.77 MB	695.76 MB	1.4 kB (0%)	🔽
linux/arm64	676.63 MB	676.63 MB	+901 B (+0%)	🔼

github-actions · 2026-02-06T16:51:44Z

Test Results

13 files + 6 13 suites +6 17m 24s ⏱️ + 13m 29s
33 tests ± 0 31 ✅ - 2 0 💤 ±0 2 ❌ +2
137 runs +68 135 ✅ +66 0 💤 ±0 2 ❌ +2

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 8a54623. ± Comparison against base commit 558e7e8.

Initial plan

0c2015a

Copilot AI assigned Copilot and rjaegers Feb 6, 2026

Copilot started work on behalf of rjaegers February 6, 2026 16:20 View session

Add Podman integration tests for OCI runtime compatibility

9a89c91

Co-authored-by: rjaegers <45816308+rjaegers@users.noreply.github.com>

github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Feb 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

Pass environment variables to Podman container

269bf0d

Co-authored-by: rjaegers <45816308+rjaegers@users.noreply.github.com>

Add comment clarifying Ubuntu runner requirement for Podman

8a54623

Co-authored-by: rjaegers <45816308+rjaegers@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI changed the title ~~[WIP] Run integration tests with Podman for OCI runtimes compatibility~~ Add Podman integration tests for OCI runtime compatibility Feb 6, 2026

Copilot AI requested a review from rjaegers February 6, 2026 16:28

Copilot finished work on behalf of rjaegers February 6, 2026 16:28

github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Feb 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Add Podman integration tests for OCI runtime compatibility#1143

Add Podman integration tests for OCI runtime compatibility#1143
Copilot wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
copilot/test-compatibility-with-podman

Copilot AI commented Feb 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Check failure

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Check failure

Check failure

Check failure

Check failure

Check failure

Check warning

Check warning

Check warning

Check warning

Check warning

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Feb 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Changes

Implementation

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Check failure

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

📦 Container Size Analysis

📈 Size Comparison Table

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

✅⚠️MegaLinter analysis: Success with warnings

Detailed Issues

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Quality Gate failed

Uh oh!

Check failure

Check failure

Check failure

Check failure

Check failure

Check warning

Check warning

Check warning

Check warning

Check warning

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

📦 Container Size Analysis

📈 Size Comparison Table

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

📦 Container Size Analysis

📈 Size Comparison Table

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Test Results

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Copilot AI commented Feb 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading