Disallow asymmetric visibility on static properties #16462
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
TimWolla
reviewed
Oct 16, 2024
iluuu1994
force-pushed
the
disallow-static-avis
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8c96c67 to
77b22ec
Compare
This check was forgotten in the original implementation. Relaxing this restriction shouldn't be hard, but needs some work. We either need to prevent merging of cache slots for R/RW/W, or we need to introduce an additional check when writing to the property indirectly. This check is currently present only for direct writes.
iluuu1994
force-pushed
the
disallow-static-avis
branch
from
77b22ec to
65ba36a
Compare
TimWolla
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/asymmetric-visibility-v2#static_properties
This check was forgotten in the original implementation. Relaxing this restriction shouldn't be hard, but needs some work. We either need to prevent merging of cache slots for R/RW/W, or we need to introduce an additional check when writing to the property indirectly.