Skip to content

Conversation

Girgias
Copy link
Member

@Girgias Girgias commented Dec 29, 2024

They have identical sizes, so there is no need for 'extra' safety.

See https://nrk.neocities.org/articles/not-a-fan-of-strlcpy for a rationale against the usage of strlcpy

They have identical sizes, so there is no need for 'extra' safety.

See https://nrk.neocities.org/articles/not-a-fan-of-strlcpy for a rationale against the usage of strlcpy
Copy link
Member

@kamil-tekiela kamil-tekiela left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is it an ABI break?

@Girgias
Copy link
Member Author

Girgias commented Jan 1, 2025

I think the bot labelled it that way because it changes a header file, @cmb69 is my guess correct?

@Girgias Girgias merged commit 249d2da into php:master Jan 1, 2025
10 checks passed
@Girgias Girgias deleted the pdo-strlcpy branch January 1, 2025 20:23
@cmb69
Copy link
Member

cmb69 commented Jan 1, 2025

Right, ABI-break-labeler is dump, and just reports any changes to published (aka. exported) headers. Doesn't really matter for master branch, since ABI breaks are allowed there anyway.

@cmb69 cmb69 removed the ABI break label Jan 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants