Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link

💡 What:

  1. Optimized IsTheSame: Refactored the method to compare two strings character by character, skipping whitespace, instead of creating multiple intermediate strings via Replace.
  2. Optimized GetIdentifier: Replaced O(N²) string concatenation in a loop with StringBuilder.

🎯 Why:

  • IsTheSame is used in hot paths during code generation (e.g., checking if file content changed). The previous implementation allocated significant memory by creating at least 8 temporary strings per call.
  • GetIdentifier performed repeated string copying, which is inefficient for longer identifiers.

📊 Impact:

  • IsTheSame: Reduced memory allocation to near zero and eliminated overhead of multiple string scans.
  • GetIdentifier: Improved time complexity from O(N²) to O(N).

🔬 Measurement:

  • Verified by code inspection and manual complexity analysis.
  • (Self-benchmarking code was created and verified locally but removed from final submission).

PR created automatically by Jules for task 15642862575378839703 started by @phuocle

- Replaced `IsTheSame` with an allocation-free character comparison loop (O(N) time, O(1) space).
- Replaced `GetIdentifier` string concatenation with `StringBuilder` (O(N) time, O(N) space).
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@phuocle phuocle requested a review from Copilot January 2, 2026 13:43
@phuocle phuocle marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2026 13:43
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR optimizes two helper methods in Helper.cs to improve performance in hot paths during code generation. The IsTheSame method now performs character-by-character comparison while skipping whitespace, eliminating multiple temporary string allocations. The GetIdentifier method replaces O(N²) string concatenation with StringBuilder for O(N) performance.

  • Replaced IsTheSame implementation to avoid creating 8+ intermediate strings per call
  • Optimized GetIdentifier from O(N²) to O(N) complexity using StringBuilder

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

return string.Equals(value1, value2, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
if (ReferenceEquals(value1, value2)) return true;
if (value1 == null || value2 == null) return false;
if (value1.Length == 0 && value2.Length == 0) return true;
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 2, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check is redundant. If both strings are empty and equal, they will typically share the same reference (both pointing to string.Empty) and will be caught by the ReferenceEquals check on line 77. If they don't share a reference but both have length 0, the main loop logic will correctly return true when both indices reach the end. Consider removing this check to simplify the code.

Suggested change
if (value1.Length == 0 && value2.Length == 0) return true;

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
}
if (i2 >= len2)
{
return i1 >= len1;
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 2, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This condition can be simplified to just 'return false;' since we know that i1 < len1 at this point (otherwise the previous check at line 99 would have been taken). The current code returns 'i1 >= len1' which will always evaluate to false here. While the logic is functionally correct, using 'return false;' would make the intent clearer.

Suggested change
return i1 >= len1;
return false;

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant