Skip to content

Conversation

@Grufoony
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.63%. Comparing base (855ee0e) to head (4a8def3).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #271   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.63%   90.63%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        5082     5082           
  Branches      462      462           
=======================================
  Hits         4606     4606           
  Misses        476      476           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.63% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

2 similar comments
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link

@github-advanced-security github-advanced-security bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Jshint (reported by Codacy) found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
body, html {

Check warning

Code scanning / Csslint (reported by Codacy)

Rule doesn't have all its properties in alphabetical order. Warning

Rule doesn't have all its properties in alphabetical order.
}

/* Fullscreen map */
#map {

Check notice

Code scanning / Csslint (reported by Codacy)

Don't use IDs in selectors. Note

Don't use IDs in selectors.
}

/* Fullscreen map */
#map {

Check warning

Code scanning / Csslint (reported by Codacy)

Rule doesn't have all its properties in alphabetical order. Warning

Rule doesn't have all its properties in alphabetical order.
}

/* Slider container */
.slider-container {

Check warning

Code scanning / Csslint (reported by Codacy)

Rule doesn't have all its properties in alphabetical order. Warning

Rule doesn't have all its properties in alphabetical order.
transform: translateX(-50%);
z-index: 1000;
width: 80%;
padding: 10px;

Check notice

Code scanning / Csslint (reported by Codacy)

Using width with padding can sometimes make elements larger than you expect. Note

Using width with padding can sometimes make elements larger than you expect.
z-index: 1000;
width: 80%;
padding: 10px;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8);

Check notice

Code scanning / Csslint (reported by Codacy)

Fallback background (hex or RGB) should precede RGBA background. Note

Fallback background (hex or RGB) should precede RGBA background.
Copy link

@github-advanced-security github-advanced-security bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stylelint (reported by Codacy) found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.

@Grufoony Grufoony merged commit fdcec46 into main Feb 18, 2025
17 checks passed
@Grufoony Grufoony deleted the webapp branch February 18, 2025 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants