Skip to content

BR v8.5.5: support br compact backup and prune field#3036

Merged
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intopingcap:release-1.xfrom
Oreoxmt:update-br-compact-v855
Jan 15, 2026
Merged

BR v8.5.5: support br compact backup and prune field#3036
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intopingcap:release-1.xfrom
Oreoxmt:update-br-compact-v855

Conversation

@Oreoxmt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt commented Dec 19, 2025

First-time contributors' checklist

What is changed, added, or deleted? (Required)

Update the TiDB version reference from "v9.0.0" to "v8.5.5".

Which TiDB Operator version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

  • main (the latest development version for v2.x)
  • v2.0 (TiDB Operator 2.0 versions)
  • release-1.x (the latest development version for v1.x)
  • v1.6 (TiDB Operator 1.6 versions)
  • v1.5 (TiDB Operator 1.5 versions)
  • v1.4 (TiDB Operator 1.4 versions)
  • v1.3 (TiDB Operator 1.3 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt self-assigned this Dec 19, 2025
@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-cherry-pick-release-1.6 Should cherry pick this PR to release-1.6 branch. labels Dec 19, 2025
@Oreoxmt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Oreoxmt commented Dec 19, 2025

/cc @lilin90 @RidRisR

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. label Dec 19, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from lilin90 December 19, 2025 03:48
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 19, 2025

@Oreoxmt: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: RidRisR.

Note that only pingcap members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

/cc @lilin90 @RidRisR

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 19, 2025
@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt added translation/done This PR has been translated from English into Chinese and updated to pingcap/docs-cn in a PR. and removed missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. labels Dec 19, 2025
@Oreoxmt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Oreoxmt commented Dec 19, 2025

/cc @YuJuncen

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from YuJuncen December 19, 2025 03:52
@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt changed the title BR v8.5.5: update br compact backup BR v8.5.5: update br compact backup and prune field Jan 12, 2026
@Oreoxmt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Oreoxmt commented Jan 12, 2026

/cc @RidRisR

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 12, 2026

@Oreoxmt: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: RidRisR.

Note that only pingcap members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

/cc @RidRisR

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt changed the title BR v8.5.5: update br compact backup and prune field BR v8.5.5: support br compact backup and prune field Jan 12, 2026
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 12, 2026

@RidRisR: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lilin90 lilin90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Jan 12, 2026
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 12, 2026

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2026-01-12 08:48:54.0588322 +0000 UTC m=+260978.120697108: ☑️ agreed by lilin90.

@Oreoxmt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Oreoxmt commented Jan 15, 2026

/unhold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 15, 2026
@Oreoxmt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Oreoxmt commented Jan 15, 2026

/approve

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 15, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Oreoxmt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jan 15, 2026
@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt added the lgtm label Jan 15, 2026
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit d50b620 into pingcap:release-1.x Jan 15, 2026
14 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-1.6: #3070.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved lgtm needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. needs-cherry-pick-release-1.6 Should cherry pick this PR to release-1.6 branch. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. translation/done This PR has been translated from English into Chinese and updated to pingcap/docs-cn in a PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants