-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
metrics: add DML rows affected metric #3909
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @wk989898, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances TiCDC's monitoring capabilities by introducing a new metric that precisely tracks the number of rows affected by Data Manipulation Language (DML) operations as they are flushed to the downstream system. This provides critical insights into the volume and type of data changes being replicated, improving observability and enabling more accurate performance analysis of the data synchronization process. The new metric is also integrated into the existing Grafana dashboards for immediate visualization. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new metric, ticdc_sink_dml_event_affected_row_count, to monitor the number of rows affected by DML operations in the sink. The changes are well-implemented, including the definition of the new Prometheus counter, the logic in the MySQL sink to track DML row types, and the recording of both expected and actual affected row counts. The Grafana dashboards have also been updated to visualize this new metric. I have a couple of suggestions for pkg/sink/mysql/mysql_writer_dml.go to improve code maintainability and cleanliness.
| // Considering the batch algorithm in safe mode is O(n^3), which n is the number of rows. | ||
| // So we need to limit the number of rows in one batch to avoid performance issues. | ||
| func (w *Writer) generateBatchSQL(events []*commonEvent.DMLEvent) ([]string, [][]interface{}) { | ||
| func (w *Writer) generateBatchSQL(events []*commonEvent.DMLEvent) ([]string, [][]interface{}, []common.RowType) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Many SQL generation functions in this file, such as this one, now return three separate slices: []string, [][]interface{}, and []common.RowType. This makes the function signatures complex and harder to maintain. To improve code clarity, consider encapsulating these related values into a struct. For example:
type dmlGroup struct {
sqls []string
values [][]interface{}
rowTypes []common.RowType
}This would simplify function signatures to something like func (w *Writer) generateBatchSQL(...) *dmlGroup. You could even potentially reuse or adapt the existing preparedDMLs struct for this purpose, which would further improve consistency.
pkg/sink/mysql/mysql_writer_dml.go
Outdated
| // if err != nil { | ||
| // log.Warn("get rows affected rows failed", zap.Error(err)) | ||
| // } else { | ||
| // w.statistics.RecordRowsAffected(rowsAffected, dmls.rowTypes[i]) | ||
| // } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #3889
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note