Bump tracing-subscriber from 0.3.19 to 0.3.20 in /rspack in the cargo group across 1 directory

[dependabot]

User description

Bumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /crates/next-error-code-swc-plugin directory: tracing-subscriber.

Updates tracing-subscriber from 0.3.19 to 0.3.20

Release notes

Sourced from tracing-subscriber's releases.

tracing-subscriber 0.3.20

Security Fix: ANSI Escape Sequence Injection (CVE-TBD)

Impact

Previous versions of tracing-subscriber were vulnerable to ANSI escape sequence injection attacks. Untrusted user input containing ANSI escape sequences could be injected into terminal output when logged, potentially allowing attackers to:

• Manipulate terminal title bars
• Clear screens or modify terminal display
• Potentially mislead users through terminal manipulation

In isolation, impact is minimal, however security issues have been found in terminal emulators that enabled an attacker to use ANSI escape sequences via logs to exploit vulnerabilities in the terminal emulator.

Solution

Version 0.3.20 fixes this vulnerability by escaping ANSI control characters in when writing events to destinations that may be printed to the terminal.

Affected Versions

All versions of tracing-subscriber prior to 0.3.20 are affected by this vulnerability.

Recommendations

Immediate Action Required: We recommend upgrading to tracing-subscriber 0.3.20 immediately, especially if your application:

• Logs user-provided input (form data, HTTP headers, query parameters, etc.)
• Runs in environments where terminal output is displayed to users

Migration

This is a patch release with no breaking API changes. Simply update your Cargo.toml:

[dependencies]
tracing-subscriber = "0.3.20"

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank zefr0x who responsibly reported the issue at security@tokio.rs.

If you believe you have found a security vulnerability in any tokio-rs project, please email us at security@tokio.rs.

Commits

• 4c52ca5 fmt: fix ANSI escape sequence injection vulnerability (#3368)
• f71cebe subscriber: impl Clone for EnvFilter (#3360)
• 3a1f571 Fix CI (#3361)
• e63ef57 chore: prepare tracing-attributes 0.1.30 (#3316)
• 6e59a13 attributes: fix tracing::instrument regression around shadowing (#3311)
• e4df761 tracing: update core to 0.1.34 and attributes to 0.1.29 (#3305)
• 643f392 chore: prepare tracing-attributes 0.1.29 (#3304)
• d08e7a6 chore: prepare tracing-core 0.1.34 (#3302)
• 6e70c57 tracing-subscriber: count numbers of enters in Timings (#2944)
• c01d4fd fix docs and enable CI on main branch (#3295)
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore <dependency name> will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency (unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot unignore <dependency name> will remove all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition> will remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore conditions
  You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

---

CodeAnt-AI Description

Upgrade Tokio runtime to 1.48.0 in rspack crate

What Changed

• The project's Tokio dependency was upgraded from 1.43.0 to 1.48.0.
• No other dependency versions in this Cargo.toml section were changed.
• Code and consumers will now run against the newer Tokio runtime, resolving incompatibilities with crates that require Tokio >=1.48.

Impact

✅ Builds with crates that require Tokio 1.48+
✅ Fewer compatibility errors when adding newer async crates
✅ Access to upstream runtime fixes included in Tokio 1.48

💡 Usage Guide

Checking Your Pull Request

Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

Talking to CodeAnt AI

Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

@codeant-ai ask: Your question here

This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

Example

@codeant-ai ask: Can you suggest a safer alternative to storing this secret?

Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt

You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:

@codeant-ai: Your feedback here

This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.

Example

@codeant-ai: Do not flag unused imports.

Retrigger review

Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

@codeant-ai: review

Check Your Repository Health

To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

[code-genius-code-coverage]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[cr-gpt]

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

[watchflow]

⚙️ Watchflow rules not configured

No rules file found in your repository. Watchflow can help enforce governance rules for your team.

How to set up rules:

1. Create a file at .watchflow/rules.yaml in your repository root
2. Add your rules in the following format:

   rules:
     - id: pr-approval-required
       name: PR Approval Required
       description: All pull requests must have at least 2 approvals
       enabled: true
       severity: high
       event_types: [pull_request]
       parameters:
         min_approvals: 2

Note: Rules are currently read from the main branch only.

📖 Read the documentation for more examples

After adding the file, push your changes to re-run validation.

[codeant-ai]

CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR.

---

Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[reviewabot]

The changes in the PR look mostly fine, but there are a few points that need attention:

1. Consecutive Line Breaks: Ensure there are no unnecessary consecutive line breaks in the Cargo.lock file. This can make the file harder to read and maintain.

2. Dependencies: The removal of the overload package and the changes in dependencies should be double-checked to ensure that they do not break any existing functionality. Make sure that all dependencies are still correctly resolved and that the project builds and runs as expected.

3. File Endings: Ensure that all files end with a newline. This is a common convention in many codebases to avoid issues with concatenation and diff tools. The Cargo.lock file should end with a newline.

4. Version Updates: The version updates for packages like tokio, idna, matchers, nu-ansi-term, mio, tracing-subscriber, and windows-sys should be tested thoroughly to ensure compatibility with the rest of the codebase. Make sure to run all tests and verify that there are no regressions.

5. Checksum Updates: The checksum updates should be verified to ensure they match the new versions of the packages being used.

Overall, the PR looks good, but please address the points mentioned above to ensure the changes are robust and maintainable.

[codara-ai-code-review]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.

1. /Cargo.toml - Update on tokio version: Upgrading tokio from version "1.43.0" to "1.48.0" without ensuring that all dependent libraries in the project are compatible with this version could lead to runtime issues or unexpected behaviors if breaking changes were introduced.

2. /crates/next-error-code-swc-plugin/Cargo.lock - Update on matchers version: Changing the matchers library version can potentially introduce issues if the new version has breaking API changes that are not handled in the surrounding codebase.

3. /crates/next-error-code-swc-plugin/Cargo.lock - Removal of overload dependency: The removal of the overload library and its associated metadata may lead to runtime errors if any existing code relies on its functionality without being updated accordingly.

4. /rspack/Cargo.lock - Update on mio version: The version update from "1.0.3" to "1.1.0" could cause compatibility issues within the code if there are any changes in the API or behavior of mio.

5. /rspack/Cargo.lock - Update on windows-sys version: The change from "0.52.0" to "0.61.2" introduces a major version change that may potentially break backward compatibility.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.

1. /Cargo.toml - Lock version against breaking changes: Consider using version constraints (e.g., tokio = "1.48.*" or tokio = "1.48.0" to ensure that updates do not include breaking changes without explicit consent) to manage dependencies better.

2. /crates/next-error-code-swc-plugin/Cargo.lock - Document removal of overload: It may be beneficial to include comments in the change log or documentation explaining the rationale for removing the overload dependency to support future maintainability and understanding.

3. /rspack/Cargo.lock - Versioning strategy: Adopt a consistent versioning strategy across all libraries. Consider using semantic versioning for all dependencies, and standardize notation (e.g., defining whether to use "*" or exact versions) across Cargo.toml files to facilitate understanding of the project’s dependency health.

4. /crates/next-error-code-swc-plugin/Cargo.lock - Dependency removal: When updating or removing dependencies, a peer review or regression test should be performed to ensure that code relying on those dependencies has not inadvertently broken.

5. General best practice - Update README or documentation: If you are upgrading major dependencies across the board, updates to the project’s documentation to alert other developers and maintainers to the changes and any potential impacts on their code would improve clarity and maintainability.

[wellcode-ai]

🔍 General Code Quality Feedback

🔍 Comprehensive Code Review

Consolidated Feedback

• 🔍 Code Review Analysis

Overall Assessment: The pull request effectively updates the tracing-subscriber dependency to address a critical security vulnerability. However, it introduces several other dependency updates that should be carefully reviewed for compatibility and potential issues.

Critical Issues:

• Issue 1: Security Vulnerability in Previous Version → The previous version of tracing-subscriber had a known vulnerability (ANSI escape sequence injection). While this PR addresses that, ensure that all usages of logging in the application are reviewed to confirm that user input is properly sanitized and logged safely.
• Issue 2: Dependency Compatibility → The update includes multiple dependencies (e.g., tokio, windows-sys) that have been upgraded. Ensure that these changes do not introduce breaking changes or compatibility issues with existing code. Conduct thorough testing after the merge.

Improvements:

• Suggestion 1: Update Documentation → Update any relevant documentation to reflect the changes in dependencies, especially if there are new features or breaking changes introduced by the updated versions. This can be done by adding a section in the README or relevant documentation files.
• Suggestion 2: Add Tests for New Functionality → Ensure that there are adequate tests covering the logging functionality, especially around user input handling. If not already present, consider adding unit tests that simulate logging of user input to verify that the new version of tracing-subscriber behaves as expected.

Positive Notes:

• The proactive approach to update a dependency with a known security vulnerability is commendable. This demonstrates a commitment to maintaining security best practices within the codebase.
• The use of Dependabot for managing dependency updates is a good practice that helps keep the project up to date with minimal manual intervention.

Next Steps:

1. Review and Test: Conduct a thorough review of the updated dependencies to ensure compatibility. Run the full test suite to catch any issues introduced by the updates.
2. Documentation Update: Update any relevant documentation to reflect the changes made in this PR, especially regarding the logging functionality and any new features introduced by the updated dependencies.
3. Add Tests: If not already present, implement tests for logging functionality that includes user input to ensure that the new version of tracing-subscriber is functioning correctly and securely.
4. Monitor for Issues: After merging, monitor the application for any unexpected behavior or issues that may arise from the updated dependencies, especially in production environments.

🤖 Generated by Wellcode.ai

[codeant-ai]

CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR.

[llamapreview]

AI Code Review by LlamaPReview

🎯 TL;DR & Recommendation

Recommendation: Approve with suggestions

This PR upgrades the Tokio runtime but contains description discrepancies and potential maintenance risks that should be addressed.

🌟 Strengths

• Proactively updates dependencies to maintain compatibility and security

Priority	File	Category	Impact Summary	Anchors
P2	Cargo.toml	Architecture	Tokio upgrade may break async runtime behavior
P2	Cargo.toml	Security	Missing security fix for ANSI escape injection
P2	Cargo.toml	Maintainability	Forked triomphe dependency risks maintenance issues
P2	crates/.../Cargo.lock	Testing	Transitive dependency changes need testing validation
P2	rspack/Cargo.lock	Architecture	Runtime upgrade could impact build performance

🔍 Notable Themes

• Dependency version discrepancies between PR description and actual code changes
• Combination of core runtime upgrades with custom forks increases integration risk

⚠️ **Unanchored Suggestions (Manual Review Recommended)**

The following suggestions could not be precisely anchored to a specific line in the diff. This can happen if the code is outside the changed lines, has been significantly refactored, or if the suggestion is a general observation. Please review them carefully in the context of the full file.

---

📁 File: crates/next-error-code-swc-plugin/Cargo.lock

Speculative: The lock file changes indicate transitive dependency updates that aren't visible in the provided context. Without seeing the actual dependency tree changes, it's impossible to assess potential breaking changes in indirect dependencies. The PR should include validation that the updated dependency graph doesn't introduce version conflicts or behavioral changes in the SWC plugin functionality.

Related Code:

[SKIPPED] File type not suitable for diff analysis

---

📁 File: rspack/Cargo.lock

Speculative: The rspack lock file changes suggest this upgrade affects the core bundler infrastructure. Given rspack's critical role in the Next.js build pipeline, the Tokio runtime upgrade could impact build performance, async task scheduling, and I/O operations. The absence of build performance benchmarks or async behavior tests in the PR context makes it difficult to validate that the upgrade doesn't introduce regressions.

Related Code:

[SKIPPED] File type not suitable for diff analysis

---

---

💡 Have feedback? We'd love to hear it in our GitHub Discussions.
✨ This review was generated by LlamaPReview Advanced, which is free for all open-source projects. Learn more.

[llamapreview]

P2 | Confidence: High

The PR description incorrectly states this is a tracing-subscriber update, but the actual code change shows a Tokio runtime upgrade from 1.43.0 to 1.48.0. This represents a significant version jump (5 minor versions) that could introduce breaking changes in async runtime behavior. While Tokio follows semantic versioning, changes between 1.43.0 and 1.48.0 include scheduler improvements, I/O driver changes, and potential behavioral differences in timer handling. The absence of related context prevents assessing if any code depends on specific Tokio behaviors that might have changed.

[llamapreview]

P2 | Confidence: Medium

Speculative: The PR description emphasizes a security fix in tracing-subscriber 0.3.20 for ANSI escape sequence injection (CVE-TBD), but the actual Cargo.toml shows tracing-subscriber remains at version 0.3.16. This creates a security discrepancy where the PR claims to address a vulnerability but doesn't actually update the vulnerable dependency. If the project logs user-provided input to terminals, it remains vulnerable to terminal manipulation attacks via ANSI escape sequences.

Suggested change

	tracing = "0.1.37"
	tracing-subscriber = "0.3.20"

[llamapreview]

[Contextual Comment]
This comment refers to code near real line 442. Anchored to nearest_changed(441) line 441.

---

P2 | Confidence: High

The project depends on a forked version of triomphe from a specific branch (sokra/unstable). This creates maintenance risks including potential incompatibilities with the upgraded Tokio runtime, lack of upstream security updates, and dependency on an unmaintained fork. The combination of upgrading core runtime dependencies while maintaining custom forks increases the risk of subtle integration issues.