-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 474
pkp/pkp-lib#12374 Fix issue preventing users from accepting invitations while logged out #12433
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
taslangraham
wants to merge
1
commit into
pkp:main
Choose a base branch
from
taslangraham:i12374-main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+23
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will bypass e.g.
HttpsPolicy, which should apply. Could you see if there's another way that doesn't require short-cutting theauthorizefunction? I worry this will have other knock-on effects.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@asmecher
Maybe something like the following would suffice.
This adds an anonymous policy class which grants access to the endpoints, but still allows the authorization checks in the base
PKPBaseControllerclass to take effect. What do you think?If we go with this approach then that anonymous policy could be moved to an actual policy class.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@taslangraham, that looks promising, but before you go that route -- can you check whether a call to
markRoleAssignmentsCheckedwould be enough? If I remember correctly, the auth code doesn't like it when code is run without an role-checking auth policy, because there's a risk that someone will forget to add the auth policy. This function will let the auth code know that it's not a mistake, we actually do want to run without a policy added.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@asmecher
I checked, and the
markRoleAssignmentsCheckedmethod alone isn't enough. Based on what you described though, if we go the route I suggested above, then it likely should be updated to also callmarkRoleAssignmentsChecked.