Add support for batch processing in Add-PnPFileSensitivityLabel cmdlet #5095
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds batch processing support to the Add-PnPFileSensitivityLabel cmdlet, allowing multiple sensitivity label assignments to be queued and executed together in a single Microsoft Graph batch operation for improved performance.
- Added batch processing capability through a new
Batchparameter and parameter sets - Refactored the existing single-file processing into separate methods for better code organization
- Updated documentation to include batch processing examples and parameter information
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/Commands/Files/AddFileSensitivityLabel.cs | Added batch processing logic with parameter sets, refactored execution flow into separate methods |
| documentation/Add-PnPFileSensitivityLabel.md | Updated syntax, description, and added batch processing example with parameter documentation |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
| private void AssignLabelImmediately(string requestUrl, string payloadJson, IFile file) | ||
| { | ||
| using var content = new StringContent(payloadJson, Encoding.UTF8, "application/json"); | ||
| using var response = GraphRequestHelper.PostHttpContent(requestUrl, content); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's trailing whitespace at the end of this line that should be removed for consistency.
| using var response = GraphRequestHelper.PostHttpContent(requestUrl, content); | |
| using var response = GraphRequestHelper.PostHttpContent(requestUrl, content); |
| Dictionary<string, string> headers = new() | ||
| { | ||
| { "Content-Type", "application/json" } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| Batch.Context.Web.WithHeaders(headers).ExecuteRequestBatch( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nitpick] The headers dictionary is created with only a Content-Type header, but this is typically handled automatically by the HTTP client when sending JSON content. Consider removing this manual header setting unless specifically required by the API.
| Dictionary<string, string> headers = new() | |
| { | |
| { "Content-Type", "application/json" } | |
| }; | |
| Batch.Context.Web.WithHeaders(headers).ExecuteRequestBatch( | |
| Batch.Context.Web.ExecuteRequestBatch( |
…roved clarity and efficiency
Before creating a pull request, make sure that you have read the contribution file located at
https://github.com/pnp/powerShell/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md
Type
Related Issues?
Fixes #X, partially fixes #Y, mentioned in #Z, etc.
What is in this Pull Request ?
Please describe the changes in the PR.
Guidance