Open
Conversation
Just for discussion for now. The use case seems appropriate, but given optional promotion in the language, maybe it's best to avoid potential type-checking issues.
benjohnbarnes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that the Tagged's other conformances have unit tests. Potentially one could be added here?
Contributor
|
This PR seems to promote the idea of wrapping an Optional type into a Tagged type (e.g. If Optional and Tagged both allow to be constructed by assigning |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just for discussion for now. The use case seems appropriate, but given optional promotion in the language, maybe it's best to avoid potential type-checking issues.