Skip to content

Conversation

@deve-sh
Copy link
Collaborator

@deve-sh deve-sh commented Jan 6, 2026

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 41.98%. Comparing base (e359733) to head (51cd1ab).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/sandbox/pmapi.js 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (100.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1102   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    41.98%   41.98%           
========================================
  Files           14       14           
  Lines          817      817           
  Branches       214      214           
========================================
  Hits           343      343           
  Misses         434      434           
  Partials        40       40           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 41.98% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

let erroredTest = false;

sandboxContext.on(`execution.error.${executionId}`, (_exec, err) => {
erroredTest = true;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not needed

function (err) {
done(err);
sandboxContext.dispose();
if (!erroredTest) { done(err); }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if (err) done (err)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

expect(grpcRequestResponse).to.have.property('statusCode', 0);
expect(grpcRequestResponse).to.have.property('responseTime', 100);
// Custom class property
expect(grpcRequestResponse).to.have.property('isCustomGRPCResponseClass', true);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done()

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@appurva21 appurva21 merged commit 40328f4 into develop Jan 12, 2026
15 of 16 checks passed
@appurva21 appurva21 deleted the fix/incorrect-name-for-getprotocolmetadata-accessor branch January 12, 2026 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants