-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
Get identifiable stream typo in error message and add subcase #3718
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nathan Dissoubray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Dissoubray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Dissoubray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Dissoubray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Dissoubray <[email protected]>
…ping Signed-off-by: Nathan Dissoubray <[email protected]>
|
I'm just surprised there is no GROUND (only DC_GROUND) in the |
Signed-off-by: Nathan Dissoubray <[email protected]>
|
Should I add two tests for BUS and DC_BUS to check that they throw ? Because here we'll get 50% coverage on new code |
I think you can add a |
Signed-off-by: Nathan Dissoubray <[email protected]>
iidm/iidm-api/src/main/java/com/powsybl/iidm/network/Network.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Olivier Perrin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NathanDissoubray <[email protected]>
|



Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
The NETWORK case now returns a stream of subnetworks instead of a PowsyblException
This stream starts with the parent network, followed by the subnetworks
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled
What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)
Other information:
@olperr1 We discussed this, but it was kinda quick, so I'm not sure if this is what we actually want to do in this case, could you confirm I didn't misunderstand ? I'll add the test once I'm sure that's what we want to do