Skip to content

Conversation

@samirromdhani
Copy link
Contributor

@samirromdhani samirromdhani commented Jan 19, 2026

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • A PR or issue has been opened in all impacted repositories (if any)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

Fixes #3708

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

  • A new contingencies provider was added to parse contingencies from JSON files: JsonContingenciesProviderFactory

    config.yml :

    componentDefaultConfig:
       ContingenciesProviderFactory: com.powsybl.contingency.JsonContingenciesProviderFactory
  • Adding 2 examples in the doc (example 3 and 4)

@samirromdhani samirromdhani changed the title add itools parameters for Security analysis Add itools parameters for Security analysis Jan 19, 2026
@samirromdhani samirromdhani force-pushed the feat/security_analysis_itools_with_json_inputs_parameters branch 12 times, most recently from ad523d0 to f6d6229 Compare January 21, 2026 15:19
@samirromdhani samirromdhani self-assigned this Jan 21, 2026
@samirromdhani samirromdhani force-pushed the feat/security_analysis_itools_with_json_inputs_parameters branch 2 times, most recently from bf2f32c to eb687da Compare January 21, 2026 15:43
@samirromdhani samirromdhani marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2026 15:43
@samirromdhani samirromdhani force-pushed the feat/security_analysis_itools_with_json_inputs_parameters branch from 07a6679 to 84f53ff Compare January 23, 2026 15:04
@samirromdhani samirromdhani marked this pull request as draft January 23, 2026 15:17
@samirromdhani samirromdhani force-pushed the feat/security_analysis_itools_with_json_inputs_parameters branch from cf3d719 to aa386df Compare January 23, 2026 15:20
@samirromdhani samirromdhani marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2026 15:23
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Run an AS with itools and json inputs for all computation parameters

2 participants