fix: pbAdSlot example showing pbjs.addAdUnits as variadic#6216
Merged
muuki88 merged 1 commit intoprebid:masterfrom Aug 19, 2025
Merged
fix: pbAdSlot example showing pbjs.addAdUnits as variadic#6216muuki88 merged 1 commit intoprebid:masterfrom
muuki88 merged 1 commit intoprebid:masterfrom
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for prebid-docs-preview ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
muuki88
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2025
Contributor
muuki88
left a comment
muuki88
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for making the docs better 👍
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was following along the documentation for pbAdSlot, found the example code was showing
pbjs.addAdUnits(unit1, unit2)but the function is not variadic. Only takes one argument of AdUnit | Array.I also checked the rest of the docs for any other instance of this, however this is the only case I found :)
🏷 Type of documentation