Skip to content

Conversation

@jsmcibm
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsmcibm jsmcibm commented Mar 8, 2023

No description provided.

@jsmcibm jsmcibm requested review from bhavani105 and kpfadnis March 8, 2023 19:59
@jsmcibm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jsmcibm commented Mar 8, 2023

This PR makes changes to the UI to support the backend used in the boolean demo. The UI changes are independent of changes in the orchestrator and services that are needed for this capability. I have tested that the UI continues to work with orchestrator/services built from main.

The corresponding change in services are on branch boolean-demo-backend2,
and the corresponding changes in orchestrator are on branch jsmc-boolean-demo.
These will be submitted in future PRs.

@kpfadnis
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsmcibm couple of clarifications/questions

  1. @seirasto Is looking into supporting evidences as a list for generative readers. Can we adopt similar approach where answer text is set to YES/NO and evidences is a list of relevant passages with/without start and end offsets?

  2. From end user perspective is it useful to highlight if we detected the question to be boolean or Factoid type? Does is alter user's satisfaction toward answer based on that visual cue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants