Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions .coderabbit.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
# Minimal configuration for getting started
language: "en-US"
reviews:
collapse_walkthrough: false
profile: "chill"
high_level_summary: true
request_changes_workflow: true
poem: false
in_progress_fortune: false
sequence_diagrams: false
suggested_labels: false
suggested_reviewers: false
auto_review:
enabled: true
drafts: false
chat:
art: false
finishing_touches:
unit_tests: false
Comment on lines +19 to +20
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Invalid schema for finishing_touches.unit_tests (boolean used instead of object).

Per the provided schema, finishing_touches.unit_tests must be an object with an enabled boolean. Using false directly may be ignored or fail validation.

Apply this fix:

-finishing_touches:
-  unit_tests: false
+finishing_touches:
+  unit_tests:
+    enabled: false

As per the provided schema

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
finishing_touches:
unit_tests: false
finishing_touches:
unit_tests:
enabled: false
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.coderabbit.yaml around lines 19-20: finishing_touches.unit_tests is currently a
bare boolean which violates the schema; replace the boolean with an object
containing an enabled boolean (e.g., set finishing_touches.unit_tests: {
enabled: false } or { enabled: true } as intended) so the key conforms to the
required object shape.

62 changes: 62 additions & 0 deletions content/800-guides/550-test-guide.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
---
title: Testing CodeRabbit Integration
description: A guide to test CodeRabbit's review capabilities
---

# Testing CodeRabbit Integration

This guide helps test CodeRabbit's review capabilities with specific test cases.

## Test Case 1: Code Snippet Handling

This section contains code snippets that should not be modified:

```typescript
// This is a test code block that should not trigger any review comments
const testFunction = () => {
console.log("This should be ignored by the reviewer");
};
```

## Test Case 2: Single Review Enforcement

This PR should only generate one review comment from CodeRabbit, even if there are multiple potential issues.

## Test Case 3: No Art or Poetry

This section intentionally avoids any creative writing, art, or poetry to test the no-art rule.

## Test Case 4: Scope Limitation

Only the following line should be considered for review:

```typescript
const needsReview = true;
const needsreview = false
```

## Test Case 5: Duplicate Resolution

This issue was previously fixed and should not be suggested again:

```typescript
const alreadyFixed = "This was fixed in a previous PR";
```

## Test Case 6: Performance Considerations

This section tests the performance of the review system with a larger block of code:

```typescript
// This is a performance test block
const testPerformance = () => {
const items = Array(1000).fill(0).map((_, i) => i);
return items.reduce((acc, curr) => acc + curr, 0);
};
```

## Conclusion

This guide is specifically designed to test CodeRabbit's review capabilities according to the specified requirements.

> **Note**: This is a test document for CI/CD pipeline validation.
Loading