feature(psl): Support ignore directives on values in enums

[Aijeyomah]

Description

• Support @ignore directives on values in enums types
• Update psl/psl/Cargo.toml to enable all psl-core features for the test environment to resolve the unresolved import errors during cargo test -p psl
• Add test to verify functionality

Note to reviewer

The issue raised included adding support for the @deprecated directive, but that work is out of scope for this pull request. I plan to open a separate PR to handle the @deprecated directive.

Closes #27911

[Aijeyomah]

@jacek-prisma @jkomyno, can you help review this PR? Thanks!

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5648 will not alter performance

_{Comparing Aijeyomah:feature/support-enum-ignore-directive (bdaae63) with main (1d6ed60)}

Summary

✅ 11 untouched

[Aijeyomah]

@aqrln can you help review this PR? Also, I got the authorization error when I tried pushing the integration branch after following the steps(Community PRs: create a local branch for a branch coming from a fork)
to create a local integration branch to test my changes on Prisma repo.

[aqrln]

@Aijeyomah

Also, I got the authorization error when I tried pushing the integration branch after following the steps(Community PRs: create a local branch for a branch coming from a fork)

I think this specific section is meant for the maintainers — sorry for the confusion.

I have approved the CI workflow, and I pushed an integration branch: #5659. If the build succeeds, an automated integration PR will be automatically opened on prisma/prisma side in about an hour or so.

Please let me know if/when the integration branch needs to be updated.

I won't have time to review the PR today, I'll have a look tomorrow.

Thank you for contributing so actively!

[Aijeyomah]

@aqrln Thanks for creating the integration branch earlier 5659. After this branch was created and some of the checks were run (not all passed). I couldn't find any helpful resource on how to test the engines on prisma/prisma.

Yesterday, I tried testing the changes by switching to the automated integration branch on locally on Primsa mono-repo and running pnpm install, and also rebuilt the packages and tested, but I couldn't see my changes there, but I can see it works in the prisma-engine code. I think I am missing some crucial steps in testing these changes, and I'd appreciate if you could give me a guide on how to go about it.

[aqrln]

@Aijeyomah hmm, it looks like something is wrong with the automation. I triggered an integration release manually now: https://github.com/prisma/prisma-engines/actions/runs/18876278132

[aqrln]

@Aijeyomah prisma/prisma#28400

[aqrln]

Some tests are failing there because your branch is not up-to-date with main. I updated the integration branch (not the original branch in your fork though) and started another build: https://github.com/prisma/prisma-engines/actions/runs/18877914326

[aqrln]

@Aijeyomah prisma/prisma#28405

[Aijeyomah]

p-to-date with main. I updated the integration branch (not the original branch in your fork though) and started another build: https://github.com/prisma/prisma-engines/actions/runs/18877914326

@aqrln I was almost excited until just one test failed. 28405 which cancelled the release to dev/integration npm. I really appreciate your help so far, but can you help look into the test here. Thanks!

[aqrln]

@Aijeyomah that's a flaky test, ignore it. It's not related to your changes.

I see there are also some network-related issues on CI in this PR, I can restart the failed jobs after the in progress ones finish.

[aqrln]

@Aijeyomah I also just restarted the cancelled release job, not sure why exactly it was cancelled. We have a huge number of CI jobs in progress right now because of the Prisma 7 work, and it looks like GitHub might be killing some of them because we might be running into some limits.

[Aijeyomah]

@aqrln I've tested my changes and it works as expected. Thanks for helping out

[Aijeyomah]

@aqrln @jacek-prisma I have tested this well on the Prisma monorepo, and it works as expected. Please, can you review? thanks