Skip to content

Conversation

@laurafitzgerald
Copy link
Contributor

Issue link

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-30722

What changes have been made

Remove existing references to 'cluster.up()' in output.
Adding to output that cluster.status() can also be used to check status of the cluster when trying to initialize the client

Verification steps

Run all the functions and check that the output is as expected.

Check test changes are appropriate and tests still passing.

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • Testing is not required for this change

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dimakis and kryanbeane October 9, 2025 15:38
LilyLinh

This comment was marked as duplicate.

Copy link
Contributor

@kryanbeane kryanbeane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 10, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 10, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 10, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.47%. Comparing base (e8404ec) to head (1d367c1).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #923   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.47%   92.47%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        1395     1395           
=======================================
  Hits         1290     1290           
  Misses        105      105           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 10, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kryanbeane, pawelpaszki

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [kryanbeane,pawelpaszki]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 10, 2025
@LilyLinh LilyLinh force-pushed the RHOAIENG-30722 branch 2 times, most recently from b05d41f to 0e81c86 Compare October 10, 2025 12:34
@LilyLinh
Copy link
Contributor

LilyLinh commented Oct 10, 2025

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 10, 2025
@LilyLinh LilyLinh force-pushed the RHOAIENG-30722 branch 2 times, most recently from 23c4fc2 to 70fe5b2 Compare October 10, 2025 13:19
@LilyLinh
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 10, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 3ee3a36 into project-codeflare:main Oct 10, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants