-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 830
address todos #1832
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
address todos #1832
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1526,6 +1526,70 @@ void testObserveMultithreaded() | |||||
| assertThat(executor.awaitTermination(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS)).isTrue(); | ||||||
| } | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| @Test | ||||||
| public void testNativeResetDuration() { | ||||||
|
||||||
| public void testNativeResetDuration() { | |
| void testNativeResetDuration() { |
zeitlinger marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| public void testNativeResetDurationNegativeValue() { | |
| void testNativeResetDurationNegativeValue() { |
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| public void testNativeResetDurationZeroValue() { | |
| void testNativeResetDurationZeroValue() { |
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| public void testNativeResetDurationSubSecond() { | |
| void testNativeResetDurationSubSecond() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe this one could be converted into an issue if we want to improve it, or we just remove the TODO comment entirely? I'm not sure the addition of this new comment is all that useful
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not mention that it's synchronized - or just leave out the optimizations?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the "Potential optimizations include:" list. it looks like this geared towards people who might refactor the code, as opposed to someone using it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed