State Decorator homogenization #264
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Depends on #260 - Change branch before merging!
Closes #262
This PR removes
@protocolState()in favor of a unified@state()decorator that works on both protocol hooks and runtime modules.Additionally, it adds prefixing on Path creation (hashing) in order to prevent collisions. Previously, if a runtime module and a hook had the same name and state property name, the path would've been the same. Through prefixed hashing, this is now prevented
This change breaks the current
stateimport from@proto-kit/module, since it moves this export to@proto-kit/protocol