Skip to content

Add polo-smm #2491

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 2 additions & 10 deletions pvlib/spectrum/mismatch.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -757,47 +757,39 @@
[1]. Polo, J., Sanz-saiz, C., Development of spectral mismatch models
for BIPV applications in building façades Abbreviations : Renew. Energy 245
,122820, 2025.:doi:`10.1016/j.renene.2025.122820`

"""
if module_type is None and coefficients is None:
raise ValueError('Must provide either `module_type` or `coefficients`')
if module_type is not None and coefficients is not None:
raise ValueError('Only one of `module_type` and `coefficients` should '
'be provided')

am_aoi = pvlib.atmosphere.get_relative_airmass(aoi)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it correct that aoi = 90 - zenith? I think so, because the surface is assumed to be vertical. If that's the case, then I think requesting zenith rather than aoi as input would be significantly easier for a user to understand.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't read the reference so perhaps I miss something, but aoi and zenith being complementary also requires the solar azimuth to be equal to the surface azimuth, which in general won't be the case, right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

requires the solar azimuth to be equal to the surface azimuth

Yes, you are correct.

pressure = pvlib.atmosphere.alt2pres(altitude)
am90 = pvlib.atmosphere.get_absolute_airmass(am_aoi,pressure)
am90 = pvlib.atmosphere.get_absolute_airmass(am_aoi, pressure)
Ram = am90/airmass_absolute

_coefficients = {}
_coefficients = {
'cdte': (-0.0009, 46.80, 49.20, -0.87, 0.00041, 0.053),
'monosi': (0.0027, 10.34, 9.48, 0.307, 0.00077, 0.006),
'cigs': (0.0017, 2.33, 1.30, 0.11, 0.00098, -0.0177),
'asi': (0.0024, 7.32, 7.09, -0.72, -0.0013, 0.089),
}

c = {
'asi': (0.0056, -0.020, 1.014),
'cigs': (-0.0009, -0.0003, 1),
'cdte': (0.0021, -0.01, 1.01),
'monosi': (0, -0.003, 1.0),
}

if module_type is not None:
if module_type is not None:

Check failure on line 783 in pvlib/spectrum/mismatch.py

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / flake8-linter

E999 IndentationError: unexpected indent
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if module_type is not None:
if module_type is not None:

coeff = _coefficients[module_type]
c_albedo = c[module_type]
else:
coeff = coefficients
c_albedo = (0.0, 0.0, 1.0) # 0.2 albedo assumed
albedo = 0.2

smm = coeff[0] * Ram + coeff[1] / (coeff[2] + Ram**coeff[3]) \
+ coeff[4] / aod500 + coeff[5]*np.sqrt(precipitable_water)

# Ground albedo correction
g = c_albedo[0] * (albedo/0.2)**2 \
+ c_albedo[1] * (albedo/0.2) + c_albedo[2]

return g*smm
Loading