Skip to content

Conversation

@rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator

@rwgk rwgk commented Jan 1, 2023

Description

Port of fix here: google/clif@ef64abf

The fix was suggested by @lalaland (#4427 (comment)) and confirmed to be correct by @Yhg1s.

Note that the new test in test_class.py fails without this change.

Suggested changelog entry:

@rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rwgk commented Jan 2, 2023

@mattip FYI: aa68c64

Is that a known difference between cpython and PyPy?

@rwgk rwgk marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2023 03:16
@rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rwgk commented Jan 2, 2023

I'm working on the clang10 C++20 issue under #4438. Ignoring here.

@rwgk rwgk requested review from Skylion007 and henryiii January 2, 2023 03:17
@rwgk rwgk merged commit f12e098 into pybind:master Jan 2, 2023
@rwgk rwgk deleted the obj_class_name_fix branch January 2, 2023 11:46
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs changelog Possibly needs a changelog entry label Jan 2, 2023
@mattip
Copy link
Contributor

mattip commented Jan 2, 2023

Is that a known difference between cpython and PyPy?

I guess so. Someday I intend to track this down. When I tried to fix it before I broke pickling of c-extension modules. See the pypy issue.

henryiii pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2023
…4436)

* Fix `detail::obj_class_name()` to work correctly for meta classes.

* Adjust expected name for PyPy
@henryiii henryiii removed the needs changelog Possibly needs a changelog entry label Jan 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants