Add gateway route support to provider inference #3491
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Docs Preview
|
DouweM
requested changes
Nov 20, 2025
| """ | ||
| This regex matches strings of the forms: | ||
| 1. gateway/my-upstream-provider | ||
| 2. gateway:my-route/my-upstream-provider |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
infer_provider is used in infer_model, which already uses : as a separator. So gateway:my-route/my-upstream-provider:my-model would be ambiguous. Some model providers even use : (and of course /) in their model name.
I don't think we should support something here that doesn't work as a provider shorthand for infer_model.
Would gateway/my-upstream-provider@my-route be crazy?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes it significantly easier to manually specify the route when using pydantic-ai with pydantic AI gateway.